Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Ashutosh Mishra (Dr.) – Appellant
Versus
Indian Institute of Mass Communication – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. cadre appointments in educational institutions (Para 2) |
| 2. allegations against qualifications and experience of appointee (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. defense against appointment challenges (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. scope of writ of quo warranto (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. judicial authority over executive appointments (Para 14 , 19 , 23) |
| 6. conditions for issuing writ of quo warranto (Para 15 , 17) |
| 7. final judgment and dismissal of appeal (Para 24 , 25 , 26) |
JUDGMENT
1. The instant appeal has been filed impugning the Judgment dated 06.11.2020 wherein this Court dismissed W.P.(C) 4164/2020 preferred by the Appellant herein whereby the Appellant had challenged the selection/appointment of Respondent No.3 to the post of Director General of Respondent No.1, i.e. Indian Institute of Mass Communication (hereinafter referred to as "IIMC").
2. The facts leading to the instant petitions are stated as under:
a) It is stated that the Appellant here in is a Professor and Dean of the School of Mass Communication at Chitkara University, Punjab, and IIMC is an autonomous institute that has been established in the year 1965 under the aegis of the Ministry of Information and Broadcasting, i.e. Respond
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
