Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Nishant Khatri – Appellant
Versus
Jawaharlal Nehru University – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant's appeal regarding admissions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. contents of the entrance examination questioned. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. syllabus and policy adherence emphasized. (Para 5 , 6 , 9) |
| 4. court's restraint on interfering with exam content. (Para 7 , 8 , 10) |
| 5. dismissal of the appeal. (Para 11 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
Subramonium Prasad, J.
1. Aggrieved by the Order dated 16.12.2020 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C) 10469/2020, the Appellant has filed the instant appeal.
2. The facts of the case reveal that the Appellant intended to pursue M.Phil/Ph.D (International Law) from Centre for International Studies, Jawaharlal Nehru University (JNU). It is stated that Appellant took entrance examination for M.Phil/Ph.D (International Law) and he was called for viva voce of both the courses.
3. The Appellant herein submits that as per the JNU Admission Policy and Procedure, 2020-21 and the UGC (Minimum Standards and Procedure for Award of M.Phil/Ph.D Degrees) Regulations, 2016, the entrance test for M.Phil/Ph.D should consist of 50 per cent questions from research methodology and 50 per cent subject specific questions. He states that in the M.Phil/Ph.D examination conduct
The court emphasized that expert bodies in education should establish examination content, and judicial intervention is unwarranted unless clear violations of established policies are proven.
A review application cannot introduce new grounds not argued in the original hearing, and the petitioner did not qualify for the claimed relaxation under the applicable regulations.
Courts shall not interfere in academic policy matters or expert-led examination evaluation systems under writ jurisdiction unless the policy is shown to be patently arbitrary, unconstitutional, or co....
if vacant seats are at all required to be filled in, the admissions must be accorded strictly on the basis of the academic merit of the candidates and thus, the writ petitioners, who do not stand in ....
The court upheld the validity of educational qualification guidelines for Ph.D. admission, ruling that similar treatment does not extend to candidates not complying with entrance requirements, thereb....
The central legal point established in the judgment is that eligibility for admission in educational institutions must be in adherence to the extant regulations and that writ courts should refrain fr....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the binding effect of University Grants Commission regulations on the university's admission procedure, emphasizing the importance of following the....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
