SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Sunil Kumar Pandey – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments from both parties (Para 3 , 4)
3. court's observations on procedural issues (Para 5 , 6)
4. legal principles on alternate remedies (Para 7 , 8)
5. citing prior case law on judicial review (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
6. review of the appellant's prior remedies (Para 12 , 13 , 14)
7. court's sentiment on broader implications (Para 19 , 20)
8. final decision on the appeal (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Subramonium Prasad, J.

1. The instant Letters Patent Appeal has been filed by one, Mr. Sunil Kumar Pandey and his wife ("Appellant") seeking setting aside of the Order dated 21.09.2022 passed by the Ld. Single Judge in W.P.(C) 11865/2022 ("Impugned Order"). Vide the Impugned Order, the Ld. Single Judge dismissed W.P.(C) 11865/2022, while giving the Petitioner therein i.e the Appellant herein the liberty to pursue the civil suit instituted by the Petitioners themselves.

2. The Appellants have placed on record the following facts to show that they have been defrauded by one builder, namely, Kunal Structural Developers & Industries Pvt. Ltd. ("Respondent No. 3/Respondent Builder") in collusion with Indiabulls Housing Finance Limited (

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top