SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Amit Sharma, JJ.
Ravi Chandra Mishra - Appellant
Versus
Union of India - Respondent
W.P.(Crl.) 874 of 2022
Decided On : 02-11-2022




The supply of illegible relied upon documents vitiates the detention order, violating the right to make an effective representation under Article 22(5) of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 226 - Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 - Section 3(1) - Detention order challenged - Allegations against detenu for involvement in evasion of customs duty through illegal activities - Non-supply of legible relied upon documents (RUDs) significantly impairs the right to make effective representation, constituting a violation of Article 22(5) - Detaining authority relied on illegible documents, rendering subjective satisfaction invalid. (Paras 16-34)

(B) Judicial Review - The courts have a role to ensure that the impugned detention order is based on sound reasoning and valid materials, emphasizing strict adherence to due process. (Paras 11-30)

Facts of the case:
The detenu is a Customs House Agent accused of facilitating illegal imports through mis-declaration and under-valuation, with specific engagements linked to another detained individual. After an investigation, a detention order was issued based on findings from the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence, which was subsequently challenged due to non-supply of legible documents necessary for the detenu's defense.

Findings of Court:
The Court found the detention order invalidated due to violations of constitutional rights, particularly the right to make an effective representation due to the supply of illegible documents.

Issues: The main issues concerned the validity of the detention order based on the illegibility of RUDs and the principle of parity with similarly situated detenus.

Ratio Decidendi: The Court reasoned that non-supply of legible documents vitiates the subjective satisfaction required for a lawful detention order and upheld the principle of parity with previous similar cases.

Result: Writ petition allowed; detention order quashed and detenu ordered to be released.

Table of Content
1. detenu's involvement in customs violations. (Para 1 , 2)
2. non-supply of documents affects detenu's rights. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8)
3. legal standards for effective representation. (Para 16 , 21 , 22 , 23)
4. impugned detention order invalidated. (Para 30 , 31 , 32 , 34)

JUDGMENT

Siddharth Mridul, J. The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, has been instituted on behalf of Ravi Chandra Mishra (hereinafter referred to as `the detenu'), praying for a direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the detention order bearing F.NO. PD-12001/19/2021-COFEPOSA, dated 28.12.2021, issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as "COFEPOSA") against the petitioner/detenu; and for further directions that the detenu be set at liberty forthwith. At the outset, it would be pertinent to note that vide common judgment dated 02.05.2022, in the case titled Zakir Khan vs. Union of India & Ors., reported as 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1284, this Court quashed and set aside detention orders issued against the co-detenus therein.

FACTS OF THE CASE:

2. The relevant facts qua the detenu, as are necessary for the adjudication of the subject writ petition are briefly encapsulated as follows:

2.1. The detenu is engaged in his profession as a Customs House Agent ("CHA") and has been handling the customs clearing work for various importers/exporters at customs ports in Kolkata and other Indian ports. The investigation against the detenu emanates from an investigation initiated by Income Tax Department and thereafter by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence ("DRI") against one Zakir Khan whose consignments were cleared as a CHA by the detenu. The detenu, it is alleged, cleared import consignments of Zakir Khan's firms knowingly and being fully aware of the fact that Zakir Khan used to import old and used laptops, mobile phones, computer/mobile accessories from Dubai, Hong Kong, China and USA by mis-declaration and undervaluation in order to evade customs duty. The detenu has allegedly actively abetted the commission of offences under the Customs Act, 1962 leading to the evasion of customs duty.

2.2. That, Zakir Khan and one Sanjeev Kumar Yadav (also a Customs house agent) were summoned to the Office of DRI, and their voluntary statements dated 18/19.10.2021 tendered under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 were recorded wherein they allegedly admitted to their involvement in the import of electronic goods by way of mis-declaration and gross under-valuation through dummy import firms. Both Zakir Khan and Sanjeev Kumar Yadav were arrested on 19.10.2021 under the Customs Act, 1962 and remanded to judicial custody. Subsequently on 26.11.2021, detention orders were passed against Zakir Khan and Sanjeev Kumar Yadav; pursuant to their arrest by the DRI for the commission of alleged offences, punishable u/s 132/135(1)(a)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962.

2.3. It is asseverated by the official respondent that, based on information received from the Income Tax Department; the DRI, Kolkata Zonal Unit initiated search proceedings on 22.10.2021 at the office premises of customs broker firm M/s Jyoti Enterprises located at Room No. 908A, Diamond Heritage Building, 16, Strand Road, Kolkata; the proprietor of which firm is allegedly the detenu herein. That during the search proceedings, documents of M/s Indo Fabs, M/s Viha International and M/s R. K. Overseas were resumed for further investigation; the de-facto control/ownership of which three firms allegedly vested with Mr. Zakir Khan, although they operated as dummy firms with different proprietors who served as de-jure owners. In his statement under section 108 of the Customs Act, the detenu admitted to his involvement in import of electronic goods by way of mis-declaration and gross under-valuation through the aforem

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top