SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Del) 1770

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Siddharth Mridul, Amit Sharma, JJ.
Ravi Chandra Mishra - Appellant
Versus
Union Of India & Ors. - Respondents
W.P.(Crl) 874 of 2022
Decided On : 02-11-2022

Advocates appeared:
Mr. Shubhankar Jha, Advocate., for the Petitioner; Mr. Kirtiman Singh, CGSC for UOI alongwith Mr. Waize Ali Noor & Ms. Vidhi Jain, Advocates., for the Respondents

The illegibility of relied upon documents (RUDs) vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, rendering the detention order invalid.

Headnote:

detention order - Ravi Chandra Mishra - Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (COFEPOSA) - Section 3(1) - The judgment discusses the illegibility of relied upon documents (RUDs) and their impact on the detenu's right to an effective representation. The court found that the illegible RUDs vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, rendering the detention order invalid. The court also considered the principle of parity with a similar case and ultimately set aside and quashed the detention order.

Fact of the Case:

The detenu, a Customs House Agent, was alleged to have knowingly facilitated the evasion of customs duty by clearing import consignments of Zakir Khan's firms, which were mis-declared and undervalued. The detenu was arrested and a detention order was issued under COFEPOSA based on his alleged involvement in smuggling activities.

Finding of the Court:

The court found that the illegible RUDs vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, rendering the detention order invalid. The detenu was also found to be similarly placed as the detenus in a similar case, attracting the ground of parity.

Issues: 1. Whether the supply of illegible RUDs vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, rendering the impugned detention order invalid. 2. Whether the detenu is similarly placed as the detenus in a similar case so as to attract the ground of parity.

Ratio Decidendi: The illegibility of relied upon documents (RUDs) vitiates the subjective satisfaction of the detaining authority, rendering the detention order invalid. The detenu's similarity to the detenus in a similar case attracts the ground of parity.

Final Decision: The impugned detention order bearing No. PD-12001/19/2021-COFEPOSA, dated 28.12.2021 passed against the detenu is hereby set-aside and quashed. The detenu is directed to be set at liberty forthwith; unless his custody is required in connection with any other case.

JUDGMENT

 Siddharth Mridul, J. - The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure 1973, has been instituted on behalf of Ravi Chandra Mishra (hereinafter referred to as 'the detenu'), praying for a direction in the nature of certiorari for quashing of the detention order bearing F.NO. PD-12001/19/2021-COFEPOSA, dated 28.12.2021, issued under Section 3(1) of the Conservation of Foreign Exchange and Prevention of Smuggling Activities Act, 1974 (hereinafter referred to as 'COFEPOSA') against the petitioner/detenu; and for further directions that the detenu be set at liberty forthwith. At the outset, it would be pertinent to note that vide common judgment dated 02.05.2022, in the case titled Zakir Khan vs. Union of India & Ors., reported as 2022 SCC OnLine Del 1284, this Court quashed and set aside detention orders issued against the co-detenus therein.

FACTS OF THE CASE:-

2. The relevant facts qua the detenu, as are necessary for the adjudication of the subject writ petition are briefly encapsulated as follows: -

2.1. The detenu is engaged in his profession as a Customs House Agent ('CHA') and has been handling the customs clearing work for various importers/exporters at customs ports in Kolkata and other Indian ports. The investigation against the detenu emanates from an investigation initiated by Income Tax Department and thereafter by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence ('DRI') against one Zakir Khan whose consignments were cleared as a CHA by the detenu. The detenu, it is alleged, cleared import consignments of Zakir Khan's firms knowingly and being fully aware of the fact that Zakir Khan used to import old and used laptops, mobile phones, computer/mobile accessories from Dubai, Hong Kong, China and USA by mis-declaration and undervaluation in order to evade customs duty. The detenu has allegedly actively abetted the commission of offences under the Customs Act, 1962 leading to the evasion of customs duty.

2.2. That, Zakir Khan and one Sanjeev Kumar Yadav (also a Customs house agent) were summoned to the Office of DRI, and their voluntary statements dated 18/19.10.2021 tendered under Section 108 of the Customs Act, 1962 were recorded wherein they allegedly admitted to their involvement in the import of electronic goods by way of mis-declaration and gross under-valuation through dummy import firms. Both Zakir Khan and Sanjeev Kumar Yadav were arrested on 19.10.2021 under the Customs Act, 1962 and remanded to judicial custody. Subsequently on 26.11.2021, detention orders were passed against Zakir Khan and Sanjeev Kumar Yadav; pursuant to their arrest by the DRI for the commission of alleged offences, punishable u/s 132/135(1)(a)(b) of the Customs Act, 1962.

2.3. It is asseverated by the official respondent that, based on information received from the Income Tax Department; the DRI, Kolkata Zonal Unit initiated search proceedings on 22.10.2021 at the office premises of customs broker firm M/s Jyoti Enterprises located at Room No. 908A, Diamond Heritage Building, 16, Strand Road, Kolkata; the proprietor of which firm is allegedly the detenu herein. That during the search proceedings, documents of M/s Indo Fabs, M/s Viha International and M/s R. K. Overseas were resumed for further investigation; the de-facto control/ownership of which three firms allegedly vested with Mr. Zakir Khan, although they operated as dummy firms with different proprietors who served as de-jure owners. In his statement under section 108 of the Customs Act, the detenu admitted to his involvement in import of electronic goods by way of mis-declaration and gross under-valuation through the aforementioned import firms allegedly owned/ controlled by Zakir Khan.

2.4. That upon further examination/ valuation of goods imported under the aegis of the aforementioned firms, purportedly owned/controlled by Zakir Khan, a Show Cause Notice (SCN) No. 01/2022 dated 08.04.2022 was issued by the D

                        Click Here to Read the rest of this document
                        1
                        2
                        3
                        4
                        5
                        6
                        7
                        8
                        9
                        10
                        11
                        SupremeToday Portrait Ad
                        supreme today icon
                        logo-black

                        An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

                        Please visit our Training & Support
                        Center or Contact Us for assistance

                        qr

                        Scan Me!

                        India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

                        For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

                        whatsapp-icon Back to top