Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Amarjeet Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Serious Fraud Investigation Office – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail applications filed under cr.p.c. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. background investigation details and applicants' remand history. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. arguments for the applicants regarding remand legality. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 4. concerns about influencing witnesses and merits of claims. (Para 9 , 10 , 39) |
| 5. allegations against applicants detailed in status report. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 6. supreme court's interpretation on default bail eligibility. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 7. judicial observations on legality of remand orders. (Para 24 , 30) |
| 8. final conclusion on bail applications. (Para 43) |
JUDGMENT
1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicants seeking bail in CNR NO. DLSW01-005039-2022, Reg. No. CC/374/2022, SFIO v. Bhushan Airways Services Pvt Ltd. & Ors..
2. Since the issues involved in both the bail applications are similar, the same are being decided by this common order. The facts are being taken from BAIL APPLN. 2707/2022, Amarjeet Sharma v. S.F.I.O..
3. As per the averments made in the bail application, it is seen that on 03.05.2016, the Ministry of Co
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
