SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
Amarjeet Sharma – Appellant
Versus
Serious Fraud Investigation Office – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The present bail applications have been filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (Cr.P.C.) read with Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C. on behalf of the applicants seeking bail in CNR NO. DLSW01-005039-2022, Reg. No. CC/374/2022, SFIO v. Bhushan Airways Services Pvt Ltd. & Ors..

2. Since the issues involved in both the bail applications are similar, the same are being decided by this common order. The facts are being taken from BAIL APPLN. 2707/2022, Amarjeet Sharma v. S.F.I.O..

3. As per the averments made in the bail application, it is seen that on 03.05.2016, the Ministry of Corporate Affairs, Government of India, (hereinafter referred to as "MCA") in exercise of its powers conferred under Section 212 (1)(c) of the Companies Act, 2013, assigned the investigation into the affairs of Bhushan Power and Steel Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as "BPSL") and its 10 group companies to Serious Fraud Investigation Office (hereinafter referred to as "SFIO"). On 08.01.2018 MCA, vide another order granted approval under Section 219(b) & (c) of the Companies Act, 2013 to investigate 20 group companies associated with BPSL. It is contended on behalf of the applica

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top