IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.
Chitra Ramkrishna – Petitioner
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Through the Investigating Officer … Respondent.
Bail Appln. 1522/2022 & Crl. M. (Bail) 587/2022
Decided on : 28-09-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. investigation and allegations against the accused. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. details regarding anand subramanian's appointment. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. analysis of the role of various parties in the allegations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. court's observations on previous bail applications. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 6. claims of inefficient investigation and default bail argument. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. applicant's context and qualifications. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. defense arguments related to the charges. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. legal principles regarding bail. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. final court orders on bail application. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.
The present bail application is filed under section 439 read with 482 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code)” for grant of regular bail in FIR bearing no RC/AC1/2018/A0011 dated 28.05.2018 registered at PS CBI/AC-I for offences punishable under sections 120B/204 IPC and sections 7/12/13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘PC Act’) and section 66 of the Information Technology Act, 2000. The petitioner prayed as under:
b) Grant regular bail to the Applicant and direct her release in connection with FIR No. RC/AC1/2018/A0011 dated 28.05.2018 lodged with P.S. CBI/AC-I;
c) Pass any other order/s, which this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.
2. The facts as alleged in FIR are that Sanjay Gupta who was owner and promoter of M/s OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. during 2010 to 2014 abused the server architecture of National Stock Exchange (hereinafter referred to as “NSE”) in criminal conspiracy with unknown officials of NSE. Sanjay Gupta with the help of his brother in law namely Aman Kokrady and other unknown persons in furtherance of the criminal conspiracy managed data centre staff of NSE who passed the information regarding switching on time of NSE exchange servers. OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. by unknown officials of NSE was given access to technologically latest and least crowded servers at that particular period which helped OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. to be mostly to login firstly on the Exchange Server of the NSE and this particular setup of server gives a 10 : 1 (Approx.) speed advantage in comparison to other brokers. The information was disseminated till 2014 by exchange server to the brokers attached with co-location facility through ‘tick by tick’ (TBT) based system architecture. The architecture data was disseminated in a sequential manner whereby the stock broker who connected first to the server of Stock Exchange received ticks i.e. market feed before the stock broker who connected later. Sanjay Gupta had enjoyed unfair access to co-location facility of NSE between 2010 to 2014 that enabled OPG Securities Pvt. Ltd. to login first to the secondary server and to get the data before everyone else which allowed a split second faster access to the data feed of NSE. A split-second faster access is considered to result in huge gains for any stock trader.
3. NSE did not have the system of starting TBT servers (tick by tick server) at a fixed time every day. Sanjay Gupta with the help of and from unknown persons managed the data centers staff of NSE who passed the information regarding switching on time of NSE exchange servers. NSE improved the system of imbalance load factor among different TBT co-location server during October 2012 and introduced load balancer among the various TBT co-location servers. Load balancer ensured that the load is evenly distributed among the TBT servers. There were back up servers were also available in NSE for providing connection to the servers of the brokers only in case if primary servers had some technical glitch or failure. The servers of all other brokers were connected to the primary servers of NSE but Sanja
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement, (2020) 13 SCC 791 and Sanjay Chandra v. CBI
Y.S. Jagan Mohan Reddy v. Central Bureau of Investigation
State of Gujrat v. Mohanlal Jitamalji Porwal
State of Gujarat v. Mohanlal Jitamalii Porwal (1987) 2 SCC 364
P. Chidambaram v. Directorate of Enforcement
Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain v. State of Maharashtra
Tunde Gbaja v. CBI, 2007 SCC OnLine Del 450; M Ravindran v. DRI
Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam
Dinesh Dalmia v. CBI, 2008 Cri LJ 337 and Abdul Azeez PV v. NIA
State of Maharashtra v. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dogre
Maharashtra v. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre
Deepender Kumar Srivastava v. State
Satender Kumar Antil v. Central Bureau of Investigation
M Ravindran v. The Intelligence Officer
Maneka Gandhi v. Union of India
Uday Mohanlal Acharya v. State of Maharashtra
Akula Ravi Teja v. State of A.P.
Serious Fraud Investigation Office v. Rahul Modi
Fakhrey Alam v. The State of Uttar Pradesh
Abdul Azeez P V v. National Investigation Agency
Suresh Kumar Bhikamchand Jain v. State of Maharashtra
State of Maharashtra v. Sharadchandra Vinayak Dongre
Rakesh Kumar Paul v. State of Assam
Dinesh Dalmia CBI, 2008 Cri LJ 337 and Abdul Azeez PV v. NIA
The main legal principle established is that the accused is entitled to default bail if the investigation is not completed within the mandated period, as per the legislative intent of section 167(2) ....
(1) Default bail – Once challan has been filed, question of grant of bail has to be considered and decided only with reference to merits of case under provisions relating to grant of bail to accused ....
(1) Default bail – An incomplete charge-sheet filed without completing investigation cannot be used to defeat right of statutory bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C.(2) Default bail – Investigative a....
Default bail under Section 167(2) Cr.P.C. ceases once a charge-sheet is filed, irrespective of ongoing supplementary investigations.
Once chargesheet has been filed within the stipulated time, the question of grant of statutory bail or default does not arise.
The completion of investigation and the filing of a charge sheet are prerequisites for determining the entitlement to statutory bail under Section 167(2) of Cr.P.C.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.