Back
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Chitra Ramkrishna – Appellant
Versus
Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) Through the Investigating Officer – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding the fir. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. investigation and allegations against the accused. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. details regarding anand subramanian's appointment. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. analysis of the role of various parties in the allegations. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. court's observations on previous bail applications. (Para 19 , 20) |
| 6. claims of inefficient investigation and default bail argument. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 7. applicant's context and qualifications. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 8. defense arguments related to the charges. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
| 9. legal principles regarding bail. (Para 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 10. final court orders on bail application. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN, J.
The present bail application is filed under section 439 read with 482 of the CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE , 1973 (hereinafter referred to as “the Code)” for grant of regular bail in FIR bearing no RC/AC1/2018/A0011 dated 28.05.2018 registered at PS CBI/AC-I for offences punishable under sections 120B/204 IPC and sections 7/12/13(2) read with 13(1)(d) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 (hereinafter referred to as ‘PC Act’) and section 66
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
