DELHI HIGH COURT
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Ram Prasad – Appellant
Versus
BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. claims regarding electricity supply and occupation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. electricity as an essential service that cannot be withheld. (Para 4) |
| 3. procedural assurance for considering electricity connection. (Para 5) |
| 4. conditions and order regarding electricity connection. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
JUDGMENT
Manoj Kumar Ohri, J. (Oral)--By way of the present petition filed under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who claims to be in occupation of Kiosk No.84, Tanga Stand, Nand Nagri, Delhi-110093 (hereinafter, referred to as the `subject property'), seeks directions to respondent No.1/BSES Yamuna Power Ltd. to restore electricity supply at the subject property through CA No. 151607506 or provide fresh electricity connection in his name without insisting on an NOC from Smt. Kushma Devi.
2. On 07.07.2022, this Court had noted the submission of learned counsel for the petitioner that the subject property was initially allotted to Smt. Kushma Devi and the electricity connection installed at the subject property was disconnected on 17.05.2022, despite payment of the entire dues. Noting the submissions, Smt. Kushma Devi was directed to be impleaded as re
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.