Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
MS Aman Engineering Works – Appellant
Versus
Registrar Trade Marks, Trade Marks Registry, New Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing for trademark registrations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. grounds for reviews of trademark applications. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. arguments relating to delay and jurisdiction. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. court's view on petitioner's standing. (Para 14 , 15) |
| 5. review application time limits. (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 6. interpretation of delay in submission rules. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 7. order to set aside previous decisions. (Para 36 , 37) |
JUDGMENT
Navin Chawla, J.
1. This petition has been filed challenging the orders dated 07.01.2020 passed by the learned Senior Examiner of Trade Marks, Delhi in TM-M Review Applications nos. 631248 for the mark "RITE KRANTI" [review filed by the respondent no. 2 against order dated 09.07.2002] and 765101 for the mark "B&M KRANTI" [review filed by the respondent no. 2 against order dated 11.08.2006], allowing the aforementioned review applications filed by the respondent no. 2.
2. By the application no. 631248 filed on 16.06.1994, the respondent no. 2 applied for the registration of the mark "RITE KRANTI" in Class 9 with respect to "water meters, oil meters, gas meters, speed meters and meters of all types". An Examination Report dated 05.10.1999
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
