Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Murli Dhar – Appellant
Versus
Apsara Biscuits Company – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to order dated 9th dec & 20th apr. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. remanded case for fresh adjudication due to initial non-evidence. (Para 3) |
| 3. petitioner's requests for evidence and affidavits considered. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. opportunities for evidence granted by labour court without further affidavits. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 5. court orders disposal of the petition with directions. (Para 9) |
JUDGMENT
Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)
CM APPL.30550/2022 (exemption)
Exemption is allowed subject to all just exceptions.
W.P.(C) 10568/2022
1. The present petition has been filed for challenging the order dated 9th December, 2021 and 20th April, 2022.
2. The facts required for the adjudication of the present matter can be recapitulated very briefly. In LIR No. 3887/2016 the petitioner's claim was rejected by the learned Labour Court vide order dated 15th April, 2019 on the ground that the petitioner-workman had failed to lead the evidence.
3. This was challenged by the petitioner-workman vide W.P.(C) No. 8487/2019.This Court vide order dated 14th January, 2020 inter alia held as under;
"4. From a perusal of the record, it transpires that since the industrial dispute was still at the ini
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
