Kapil Goel vs Ram Dulare Yadav @ Gandhi Bhai

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Kapil Goel – Appellant
Versus
Ram Dulare Yadav @ Gandhi Bhai – Respondent

Table of Content
1. institution of suit requirements. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. mediation process initiation. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
3. mandatory nature of section 12a. (Para 8 , 12 , 18)
4. dispute on mediation process participation. (Para 9 , 10 , 11)
5. plaintiff's actions sufficient if both parties refuse mediation. (Para 14 , 16)
6. successful appeal leads to restoration of suit. (Para 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

1. The instant appeal arises out of Order dated 07.04.2021, passed by the learned District Judge, Commercial Court-II, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, in CS (COMM) 82/2019.

2. CS (COMM) 82/2019 was filed by the Appellant herein/Plaintiff for recovery of Rs.27,33,433/- from the Respondent herein/Defendant. Learned District Judge, Commercial Court-II, Shahdara, Karkardooma Courts, Delhi, vide Order impugned herein dismissed the Suit by allowing the application filed by the Respondent herein/Defendant under Order VII Rule 11(d) of the CPC on the ground of Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act'), which mandates Pre-Institution Mediation.

3. The facts leading up to the filing of this Appeal are as under:

a) The Appellant herein runs a busine

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTSATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASADKapil Goel – AppellantVersusRam Dulare Yadav @ Gandhi Bhai – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Kapil Goel – Appellant
Versus
Ram Dulare Yadav @ Gandhi Bhai – Respondent