NITIN JAMDAR, C.V.BHADANG
Deepak Raheja – Appellant
Versus
Ganga Taro Vazirani – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Nitin Jamdar, J.—The Respondent filed a commercial summary suit in the Commercial Division of this Court for a decree against the Appellant for Rs.5.54 crores with accrued interest. In this suit, the Respondent took out a summons for judgment. By the impugned order, the learned Single Judge, as Commercial Division, disposed of the summons for judgment granting leave to defend to the Appellant but upon a condition of depositing Rs.5.54 crores. Being aggrieved, the Appellant has filed this Commercial Appeal.
2. The Appellant-Defendant requested the Respondent- Plaintiff for rendering financial assistance and a business loan. The Respondent advanced a sum of Rs.5.00 crores to the Appellant. The loan was to be paid along with interest at 19% per annum. The Respondent issued a cheque for Rs.5.00 crores dated 1 January 2011 in favour of the Appellant. The Appellant encashed the cheque. The Appellant issued a Bill of Exchange dated 3 January 2011 in favour of the Respondent as a security in the sum of Rs.5.00 crores. The Appellant paid interest on the loan to the Respondent as agreed till 9 December 2016. On 9 December 2016, the Appellant wrote to the Respondent to reduce interes
Bihari Chowdhary v. State of Bihar
Amar Nath Dogra v. Union of India
State of Andhra Pradesh v. Gundugola Venkata Suryanarayana Garu
SCG Contracts (India) Private Ltd. v. K.S. Chamankar Infrastructure Private Limited
Chandrashekhar Purushottam Rathi v. State of Maharashtra
ALAR Vellayan Chettiar and Ors. v. Government of the Province of Madras and Anr.
Afcons Infrastructure Ltd. and Anr. v. Cherian Varkey Construction Co. Pvt. Ltd. and Ors.
Salem Advocate Bar Association, T.N. v. Union of India
Ambalal Sarabhai Enterprises Ltd. v. K.S. Infraspace LLP. & Anr.
(1) Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory and enacted in larger public interest. Section 12A does not come into play if suit contemplates an urgent relief.(2) If plain meaning of wo....
The court emphasized the importance of pre-institution mediation in commercial disputes, the need for proper infrastructure and trained mediators, and the court's discretion to adjust equities for th....
(1) Section 12A of Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory – Any suit instituted violating mandate of Section 12A must be visited with rejection of plaint under Order VII Rule 11 – This power can be....
The judgment establishes the mandatory nature of pre-institution mediation under Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, emphasizing the retrospective effect of the provision and the distinction be....
Maintainability of commercial suit – Suit which does not contemplate any urgent interim reliefs cannot be instituted unless plaintiff exhausts mandatory remedy provided under Section 12A of Commercia....
Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act requires pre-institution mediation for suits not seeking urgent relief, establishing a mandatory procedural framework.
The Commercial Courts Act mandates pre-institution mediation under Section 12A, which is to be enforced prospectively from 20.08.2022, allowing suits filed before this date to proceed without dismiss....
The court established that compliance with Section 12A of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 is mandatory for suits not seeking urgent interim relief, and allowed for mediation to be explored before pro....
Pre-Institution Mediation and Settlement - Provisions of Section 12A of Act and Rules, in the context of pre-existing provisions of Code and General Rule Civil, as made applicable to proceedings unde....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.