SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Vibhu Bakhru, J.
Vidhur Bhardwaj - Appellant
Versus
Horizon Crest India Real Estate - Respondent
O.M.P. (COMM) 436 of 2020 & IA Nos. 6549 of 2021 & 7266 of 2021
Decided On : 16-11-2022




An application challenging an arbitral award under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act must be filed within three months of receiving the award, extendable by thirty days only if sufficient cause for delay is shown.

Headnote:(A) Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 - Section 34 - Challenge to an arbitral award - Time limit for filing application - The application under Section 34 must be filed within three months of receiving the arbitral award, extendable by thirty days if sufficient cause is shown. The petitioner received the award on 11.07.2019 and could file by 11.10.2019; however, his late application was rejected, making the current petition time-barred. (Paras 5-6, 30-32, 44-52)

(B) Binding Settlement Agreement - Clause 21 - Limitation of Liability - Clause restricts personal liability of certain individuals in relation to contractual obligations. The court found that the Arbitral Tribunal's awards against all except certain individuals were valid as those individuals were covered by the liability clause. (Paras 24, 34)

(C) The petitioner contended that an incorrect award was made against him; however, it was determined that he was subject to the findings as he was implicated in the Binding Settlement Agreement. (Paras 3-4)

(D) The issue of whether there was a clerical or typographical error in the Tribunal's findings was assessed, but the Tribunal found no sufficient basis for correction. (Paras 22-27)

Findings of Court:
The application for condonation of delay was allowed due to medical issues and the pandemic, but the limitation period for main petition was still not met.

Result: Petition dismissed as time-barred.

Table of Content
1. challenge to arbitral award under a&c act. (Para 1 , 2)
2. liability exclusions under bsa. (Para 3 , 24)
3. limitation period for filing under a&c act. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 8 , 12 , 21)
4. timing for limitation extension views. (Para 11 , 30)
5. implications of filing section 33 application. (Para 14 , 15 , 18 , 19)
6. rejection of claims based on limit and merit. (Para 37 , 48 , 49)

JUDGMENT

Vibhu Bakhru, J. The petitioner has filed the present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereafter `the A&C Act') impugning an arbitral award dated 02.07.2019 rendered by an Arbitral Tribunal comprising of three arbitrators (hereafter `the Arbitral Tribunal').

2. The disputes between the parties, essentially, arise from the Binding Settlement Agreement dated 05.04.2016 (hereafter `the BSA'). By the impugned award, the Arbitral Tribunal has awarded damages quantified at Rs.4,795,079,144/-; costs quantified at Rs.59,829,209/-; and interest on the awarded amounts at the rate of 8% per annum from the date of the award till the date of payment, in favour of respondent nos. 1 to 6.

3. The petitioner claims that the impugned award to the extent it makes him liable to pay the awarded amount is, ex facie, erroneous and contrary to the provisions of the BSA. It is his case that the BSA expressly provides that certain other individuals and him, shall not be personally liable for the obligations stipulated under the BSA. Therefore, in terms of the BSA, he could not be made liable for any monetary damages awarded against other corporate entities. More so, as respondent nos. 1 to 6 (the claimants before the Arbitral Tribunal) had specifically given up their claim to lift the corporate veil and impute the corporate liability on the shareholders/promoters of the corporate entities.

4. The preliminary question to be addressed is whether the present petition is barred by limitation. There are several parts to this issue. First, relates to the time available for filing the petition. Second, relates to whether in the facts of this case, time available for filing the petition is to be computed from disposal of the application filed by the petitioner under Section 33 of the A&C Act. The third aspect to be considered is whether the delay, if any, can be condoned by this Court and, if so, whether there are sufficient reasons to do so.

RE: THE PERIOD OF LIMITATION:

5. In terms of Section 34(3) of the A&C Act, an application under Section 34 of the A&C Act is required to be filed within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of the arbitral award. In terms of the proviso to Section 34(3) of the A&C Act, the court may entertain an application within a period of further thirty days subject to it being satisfied that the applicant was prevented by sufficient cause from making an application within a period of three months from the date of the receipt of the arbitral award.

6. In the present case, the impugned award was made on 02.07.2019 and the petitioner claims that he received it on 11.07.2019. Thus, the present petition could be filed within a period of three months from the said date, that is, on or before 11.10.2019.

7. However, on 01.08.2019, Mr Nirmal Singh (arrayed as respondent no. 35 before the Arbitral Tribunal) filed an application under Section 33 of the A&C Act before the Arbitral Tribunal, inter alia, claiming as under:

"The applicant submits and prays that the aforesaid errors in paras 74 & 141 of the Arbitral Award dated 02.07.2019 be corrected holding that the reference to the respondents in paras 74 & 141 excludes Respondent No.35 Mr. Nirmal Singh along with LG Respondents."

8. The said applicant (Mr Nirmal Singh) claimed that in terms of Clause 21 of the BSA, he could not be made personally liable for failure to perform any obligations under the BSA. According to him, his position was similar to respondent nos. 16, 22, 23, 24, and 38 before the Arbitral Tribunal (referre








Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
Judicial Analysis

AI

SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top