SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SURESH KUMAR KAIT, SAURABH BANERJEE
Punjab National Bank – Appellant
Versus
Subhash Aggarwal – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Saurabh Banerjee, J. Appellant-bank/original defendant no.1 before the learned Trial Court has impugned the judgment dated 18.02.20201 whereby its application under Order VII rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 19082 in a suit for declaration instituted by respondent nos. 1, 2 and 3/original plaintiffs3 against the appellant-bank and Union of India/respondent no.4 has been rejected and a judgment under Order XII rule 6, CPC has been pronounced against the appellant bank, in favour of the respondents.

2. Facts before us disclose that one Mr. Ajay Gupta4 availed loan after mortgaging House No. H-208, Ashok Vihar, Phase-I, Delhi-1100525 with the appellant-bank. As the said original borrower defaulted in repaying the loan, appellant-bank initiated proceedings under Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 20026 and after taking possession, issued notice for public auction. Respondents, vide e-auction dated 15.07.2016 bought the property for Rs.6,10,05,000/- and deposited 25% of the bid amount alongwith the TDS of 1% from 15.07.2016 to 17.08.2016. Sale thereof was confirmed on 25.07.2016 and th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top