Situ Ramnath Shastri vs I.F.C.I. Factors Ltd.

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Situ Ramnath Shastri – Appellant
Versus
I.F.C.I. Factors Ltd. – Respondent

Table of Content
1. petition for quashing previous orders. (Para 1 , 2)
2. observations regarding interlocutory nature of orders. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding res judicata and prosecutorial gap. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. justification for allowing evidence under section 311 cr.p.c. (Para 8 , 10)
5. conclusion to uphold previous orders. (Para 9 , 15)
6. finality and maintability of interlocutory orders. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Rajnish Bhatnagar, J.

1. The present petitions under Section 482 Cr.P.C. read with Article 227 of the Constitution of India have been filed by the petitioner, namely, Situ Ramnath Shastri, with the following prayers:

a) Allow the present petition and quash/ set aside both the Impugned orders viz. order dated 16.01.2021 passed by the Addl. Sessions Judge-03, Patiala House Courts, New Delhi in Criminal Revision Petition/Application No. 719/2019 filed in Complaint Case No. 19815/2016 and in Criminal Revision Petition/Application No. 720/2019 filed in Complaint Case No. 19822/2016 and order dated 03.10.2019 passed by the Ld. MM (N.I. Act)-0 1, Patiala House Court at New Delhi in Complaint Case Nos. 19815/2016 and 19822/2016 as being illegal, null and void;

b) Pas

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTRAJNISH BHATNAGARSitu Ramnath Shastri – AppellantVersusI.F.C.I. Factors Ltd. – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
RAJNISH BHATNAGAR
Situ Ramnath Shastri – Appellant
Versus
I.F.C.I. Factors Ltd. – Respondent