SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
S.G. Parashar – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent


ORDER

Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)

1. The instant civil writ petition is filed by the Petitioner under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following reliefs:

    "Issue Writ of Mandamus or certiorari or any other appropriate writ or directions thereby quashing the impugned decision dated 21.04.2003 and as a necessary consequence thereof for quashing the impugned office order dated 7.7.2003.

    Issue Writ of Mandamus or certiorari or any other appropriate writ or directions directing the Respondent No. 3 to implement the recommendation of the 5th Pay Commission Report with regard to increase in age of superannuation from 58 to 60 years as has been done by the Central Government for its employees and has also been done by other organization/autonomous bodies similar to the Respondent No. 3."

2. The Petitioner at the time of the filing of the writ petition was holding the charge of the post of Executive Director (Estate & Admin.) with Respondent No.3 (hereinafter referred to as "R3"). Respondent No.1 has all the control over the affairs of the R3 whereas Respondent No.2 is the ministry responsible for the office memorandum dated 13th May 1998 which pertains to the reco

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top