Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
CHANDRA DHARI SINGH
Hargovind – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT Delhi – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's request and background details. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments regarding the rejection of the application. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court analysis on the rejection reasoning and the scheme of 1961. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 4. final decision on the dismissal of the petition. (Para 22 , 23) |
JUDGMENT
Chandra Dhari Singh, J. (Oral)
1. The instant writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed by the Petitioner, inter alia, seeking the following reliefs:
(i) Issue a Writ Order or direction thereby quashing the letter dated 30.10.2017; and
(ii) Pass a Writ of Memorandum thereby directing the Respondents to recommend the name of the Petitioner to DDA for allotment of a alternate plot in terms of the Policy of the Respondents.
2. The brief facts of the instant case are that the father of the Petitioner was an Agriculturist by profession and owned an agricultural land in Village Jogabai, Tehsil, Defence Colony, District South-East, New Delhi. The Respondent issued a notification under Section 4 and 6 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894 and the land of the father of the Petitioner was ac
A petitioner must demonstrate compliance with document submission requirements for land allotment following acquisition; rejection upheld when deficiencies persist despite multiple opportunities.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioners were not eligible for alternative plots under the Scheme of 1961 and Section 21 of the DDA Act due to the availability of plot....
Delay and laches can defeat a claim for relief, and the law of limitation must be applied with all its rigour when the statute prescribes a limitation period.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the application for allotment of alternative land should be made within one year of the receipt of compensation as fixed by the Collector, as ....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the petitioner's claim for an alternative plot was allowed based on the finding that the petitioner's land was acquired completely, and the co....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the court directed the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner afresh on the basis of the documents filed by the petitioner in the ....
The main legal point established is that applications for alternative plot allotment made in line with the respondent's advice and within the specified time should not be rejected based on limitation....
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the conditions for grant of alternative land under the Scheme of 1961 must be strictly adhered to, and the application for alternative land sh....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
