SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
MANMOHAN, MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-18 – Appellant
Versus
Oil Industry Development Board – Respondent


Table of Content
1. appellant challenges itat's order regarding income tax. (Para 1)
2. claim of error in deletion of tax addition. (Para 2)
3. concurrent findings of fact by authorities. (Para 3)
4. interpretation of section 14a regarding exempt income. (Para 4)
5. impact of finance act, 2022 amendment on section 14a. (Para 5)
6. no substantial question of law; appeal dismissed. (Para 6)

JUDGMENT

Manmohan, J. (Oral)--Present Income Tax Appeal has been filed challenging the Order dated 12th June, 2019 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (`ITAT') in ITA No. 4417/Del./2016 for Assessment Year 2012-13.

2. Learned counsel for the appellant states that the ITAT has erred in deleting the addition of Rs.4.65 crores made by the assessing officer under Section 14A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (`the Act'). He states that the ITAT has erred in holding that no disallowance can be made under Section 14A of the Act read with Rule 8D of the Income Tax Rule, 1962 in the case wherein no exempt income has been earned during the year under consideration.

3. A perusal of the paper book reveals that the authorities below have given concurrent finding of fact that the assessee did not earn any divid

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top