SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
JASMEET SINGH
Meenakshi @ Meenu – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for bail in a serious crime case. (Para 1)
2. factual background regarding the fir and arrest. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5)
3. arguments challenging the prosecution's evidence. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. prosecution's reliance on circumstantial evidence. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. court's observations on evidence quality and implications. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32)
6. comparison with precedent cases and assessment of circumstances. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39)
7. conclusion about the insufficiency of evidence for conviction. (Para 40 , 41)
8. final order granting bail to the applicant. (Para 42 , 43 , 44)

JUDGMENT

Jasmeet Singh, J. This is an application filed seeking bail in FIR No. 39/2020 dated 21.01.2020 registered at PS Jahangir Puri, District North-West Delhi under Section 302/120B/201/34 IPC.

2. It is stated that an FIR No. 39/2020 was registered at PS Jahangir Puri, District North-West Delhi, wherein it was mentioned that one PCR call was received regarding dead body of one 12 year old boy lying at House No. K-1136, Near Gurudwara Jh. Puri. When the I.O. reached the spot, he found

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top