SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANU MALHOTRA
Mahavir Singh – Appellant
Versus
GNCT of Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anu Malhotra, J. The petitioner Nos.1 to 4 i.e., petitioner No.1 Sh. Mahavir Singh, petitioner No.2 Smt. Urmila, petitioner No.3 Smt. Reena Rani and petitioner No.4 Sh. Sandeep Kumar, vide the present petition seeks directions to the respondent No.5, the Sub-Registrar IX (A) (Najafgarh) to register the Sale Agreement and the General Power of Attorney both dated 01.05.2018 duly executed and presented by the petitioners before the respondent No.5 vide document Nos. 320 and 321, after setting aside the impugned refusal order dated 17.05.2018 of the respondent No.5 as well as the order of the respondent No.3, i.e., the Deputy Commissioner, South-West, Kapashera in Appeal No.1/7/18 dated 07.10.2020, whereby the said appeal filed by the petitioners under Section 72 of the Indian Registration Act, 1908 was dismissed, with it having been submitted by the petitioners that the said orders are arbitrary, unwarranted, perverse, beyond jurisdiction and in violation of law resulting in manifest injustice to the petitioners.

2. The petitioners also seek exemplary cost against the respondent No. 2, the Inspector General of Registrars, Department of Revenue, Government of NCT of Delhi, s

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top