SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Supertech Realtors Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
Bank of Maharashtra – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. Aggrieved by the dismissal of the writ petition vide Order dated 17.11.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge in W.P.(C)15854/2022, the writ petitioner seeks to assail the said order by way of the instant appeal.

2. The facts in brief, as narrated by the Appellant, reads as follows:

i. It is stated that the Appellant is a part of Supertech Group, which is a real estate developer. It is stated that the Appellant approached the consortium of Banks led by Union Bank of India and consisting of Bank of Maharashtra, Central Bank of India, Oriental Bank of Commerce seeking financial assistance for a project, namely, `Supernova' at Sector 94, Noida.

ii. It is stated that a financial assistance of Rs.735 crores was agreed to be lent by the consortiumof Banks,and a sum of Rs.678.22 crore was disbursed. It is stated that a term loan of Rs.150 crores was also sanctioned by the consortium of Banks.

iii. It is stated that on 29.09.2018, the account of the Appellant was classified as Non-Performing Asset (NPA).

iv. Negotiations were held between the Appellant and the consortium of Banks. A One-Time Settlement (OTS) was entered into between the Appellant and the consortium of Bank

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top