Umesh Babu vs Jawaharlal Nehru University

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Umesh Babu – Appellant
Versus
Jawaharlal Nehru University – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application for amendment in writ petition. (Para 1)
2. challenge to refusal for relieving order. (Para 8 , 9)
3. non-application of mind in decision. (Para 10 , 11)
4. impact of inquiry officer's findings. (Para 12 , 13)
5. right to fair treatment on deputation. (Para 14 , 15)
6. importance of expedient resolution. (Para 16 , 17)
7. inquiry officer's report findings. (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
8. prejudice from delay in inquiry. (Para 21 , 22)
9. balance of interests in judicial review. (Para 23 , 24)
10. fair consideration required despite procedural rights. (Para 25 , 26)
11. final order for relieving petitioner. (Para 27 , 29)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (Oral)

C.M. No. 51963/2022 (under Order VI Rule 17 CPC, by Petitioner)

1. Present application has been preferred under Order VI Rule 17 CPC for amending the writ petition, to lay a challenge to letter dated 17.10.2022, passed during the pendency of the writ petition, whereby Respondent has refused to relieve the Petitioner for joining the deputation post.

2. Issue notice.

3. Ms. Monika Arora, learned counsel accepts notice on behalf of the Respondent.

4. For the reasons stated in the application, the same is allowed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJYOTI SINGHUmesh Babu – AppellantVersusJawaharlal Nehru University – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JYOTI SINGH
Umesh Babu – Appellant
Versus
Jawaharlal Nehru University – Respondent