Back
C. V. KARTHIKEYAN
K. Narayanan – Appellant
Versus
District Collector, Thanjavur – Respondent
JUDGMENT
(Prayer: Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, praying for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus to call for the records of the first respondent in connection with the impugned order passed by him in Na.Ka.No.2970/03/PR.1, dated 01.02.2012, confirmed by the second respondent in Na.Ka.No.1865/2009/A5, dated 22.06.2012 and further confirmed by the third respondent in G.O.D.No.29, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (PR.4) Department, dated 20.01.2016 and quash the same and direct the respondents to reinstate the petitioner into service and grant him all consequential service and monetary benefits.)
1. The Writ Petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Certiorarified Mandamus seeking interference with the order of the first respondent/District Collector, Thanjavur, dated 01.02.2012 in Na.Ka.No.2970/03/PR1, which was confirmed by the second respondent/Director of Town Panchayat, Chennai, by order dated 22.06.2012 in Na.Ka.No.1865/2009/A5 and further confirmed by the third respondent/Principal Secretary to Government, Municipal Administration and Water Supply (PR.4) Department, Chennai in G.O.(D).No.29, dated 20.01.2016 and to c
The departmental enquiry must provide an equal opportunity to the delinquent to put forth his case and cross-examine witnesses. The evidence presented must be trustworthy, and the charges must be pro....
The court emphasized the necessity of providing all relevant documents to a charged employee to ensure a fair opportunity for defense in disciplinary proceedings.
A disciplinary enquiry must be conducted in accordance with the principles of natural justice, and the enquiry report must be reasoned and based on evidence.
Dismissal orders must be passed in accordance with the principles of natural justice, including providing the employee with a reasonable opportunity to defend themselves and supplying a copy of the i....
The Disciplinary Authority can order further enquiry only if serious defects exist in the initial enquiry; it cannot do so after a finding of exoneration.
Rule 7(vii) provides that where charged government servant denies charges, enquiry officer shall proceed to call witnesses proposed in charge sheet.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
