SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
NAVIN CHAWLA
Kimaya Buildtech LLP – Appellant
Versus
Ramesh Kaul – Respondent


Table of Content
1. notice served and urgency for interim relief. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. defendant's claims of breach and tds issues. (Para 4 , 12 , 13)
3. court's analysis on readiness and prima facie case. (Para 5 , 21 , 30)
4. interim injunction criteria and specifics on tds. (Para 18 , 33 , 35)
5. concluding orders regarding defendants and amended memo. (Para 36 , 38 , 39)

JUDGMENT

Navin Chawla, J. (Oral)

I.A. 16279/2022

1. Notice on this application was issued to the defendants by the order of this Court dated 07.10.2022. On the said date, the learned counsel for the defendant no.1 had entered appearance and accepted notice on behalf of the defendant no.1. Notice was, therefore, to be served on the defendant nos.2 to 4.

2. The Office Report indicates that the report of service on the remaining defendants is awaited. The learned senior counsel for the plaintiff, however, pleaded that in absence of an ex-parte ad-interim injunction, the plaintiff apprehends that a third-party interest may be created in the property in question, and, therefore, prays for grant of an ad interim relief.

3. He has also drawn my attention to the Power of Attorney executed by the defendant nos.2 to 4 in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top