G.S. Prasannakumar vs T.M. Govindasamy Naicker, (died)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

2026 Supreme(Mad) 333

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
R.N.MANJULA
G.S. Prasannakumar – Appellant
Versus
T.M. Govindasamy Naicker, (died) – Respondent

Advocates Appeared:
For the Appellant : Mr. S. Mukunth, Senior Counsel.
For the Respondent: Mr. M. Sriram.

Table of Content
1. filing of second appeals. (Para 1 , 2 , 10)
2. basis of suits for specific performance. (Para 3 , 5 , 7)
3. defendant's rebuttal in written statement. (Para 4 , 6 , 8)
4. issues framed for trial. (Para 9 , 12)
5. counsels' submissions summarization. (Para 13 , 14 , 15)
6. court's consideration of parties' readiness. (Para 16 , 17)
7. evidentiary concerns about witness credibility. (Para 18 , 19 , 22)
8. legal position concerning contractual fulfillment. (Para 20 , 21 , 23)
9. discussions on the possession of the property. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28)
10. court's ultimate judgment rationale. (Para 29 , 30)
11. final result of the appeals. (Para 31)

JUDGMENT :

R.N.MANJULA, J.

These Second Appeals have been filed, challenging the judgment and decree made in A.S. Nos.9 to 11 of 2011 on the file of District Judge, District Court No.II, Kanchipuram confirming the judgment and decree dated 17.06.2011 made in O.S. Nos.199 of 1995, 169 of 2007 & 168 of 2007 on the file of Sub Court, Kanchipuram respectively.

2.The plaintiff in O.S. No.199 of 1995 is the plaintiff in O.S. No.168 of 2007 also. The defendant in both the suits, namely, O.S. Nos.199 of 1995 and 168 of 2007 is the plaintiff