SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Mukta Gupta, Anish Dayal, JJ.
Kunal Bhandari @ Rocky - Appellant
Versus
State - Respondent
Crl.A. 343 of 2020 and Crl.A. 501 of 2020
Decided On : 02-12-2022




The court confirmed that robust eyewitness and circumstantial evidence can sustain a conviction for serious crimes like kidnapping and murder, emphasizing reasonable doubt standards.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 364A, 302, and 201 - Conviction for kidnapping and murder - Appeals dismissed - Convicted appellants given life sentence and fines for kidnapping for ransom leading to murder and causing disappearance of evidence - Standard of proof in criminal cases emphasized, with reliance placed on eyewitness testimonies and forensic evidence for establishing guilt. (Paras 1, 2, 9, 33)

(B) Eyewitness Testimony - The reliability of eyewitness accounts is crucial, especially in cases involving serious crimes; inconsistencies must be weighed carefully against corroborating evidence. (Paras 5, 20)

(C) Circumstantial Evidence - Circumstantial evidence, when sufficiently corroborated, can establish a narrative of guilt beyond reasonable doubt despite attempts to discredit. (Paras 10, 31)

(D) Criminal Procedure - Proper procedure must be followed in investigations to uphold the integrity of evidence and avoid wrongful implication. (Paras 6, 8)

Facts of the case:
On 28th July 2009, two appellants kidnapped a 16-year-old for ransom, subsequently committing murder, leading to disposal of the body. The prosecution’s evidence included eyewitness accounts and forensic results confirming guilt.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed the conviction based on strong circumstantial evidence and witness reliability, leading to a life sentence with fines.

Issues: The main legal issues revolved around the reliability of eyewitness testimony, the weight of circumstantial evidence, and procedural integrity in police investigation.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the compelling combination of eyewitness identifications and forensic evidence established guilt beyond reasonable doubt, dismissing the appellants' claims of false implication.

Result: Appeals dismissed.

Table of Content
1. details of the kidnapping and murder (Para 2 , 3)
2. challenges to the witness credibility and evidence (Para 5 , 7 , 8)
3. outline of prosecution's evidence and arguments (Para 6 , 9)
4. testimonies linking defendants to crime (Para 19 , 20)
5. court's conclusion on guilt (Para 33)
6. final judgment and order (Para 34 , 35)

JUDGMENT

Mukta Gupta, J. By these appeals, the appellants challenge the impugned judgment dated 08th May, 2020 convicting Kunal Bhandari @ Rocky and Gaurav Chadha for kidnapping for ransom and committing murder of Master Ribhu (in short, "deceased") in furtherance of common intention and also causing disappearance of evidence by dumping the dead body at secluded place; and the order on sentence dated 3rd June, 2020 directing both Kunal Bhandari @ Rocky and Gaurav Chadha to undergo life imprisonment and to pay a fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 year under Section 364A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (in short, "IPC"); to undergo rigorous imprisonment for life alongwith fine of Rs.10,000/- and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 1 year under Section 302 IPC; and further to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 7 years alongwith a fine of Rs.5,000/- each and in default to undergo rigorous imprisonment for 6 months under Section 201 IPC. The other two accused persons Sukhvinder and Rishabh Chauhan were acquitted for charges under Sections 364A/302/201/34 IPC, but were held guilty under Section 411 IPC for receiving the stolen mobile phone of the deceased and receiving property obtained from ransom respectively. Both Sukhvinder and Rishabh Chauhan were sentenced to rigorous imprisonment for 3 years alongwith a fine of Rs.10,000/- each, and in default simple imprisonment for 6 months.

2. Brief facts of the case are that on 28th July, 2009, at about 2.45 pm, four persons kidnapped the deceased Ribhu Chawla aged about 16 years in a WagonR car from the road near Ujjwal Apartments, Vikas Puri. Despite receiving the ransom amount of Rs.15 Lacs, the accused persons murdered the deceased and disposed of the dead body in the morning of 29th July, 2009 in the Vasant Kunj Jungle near Peer Baba Mandir, in front of Ryan International School, Vasant Kunj. The investigation was set into motion on the date of incident itself i.e. 28th July, 2009 pursuant to ruqqa Ex.PW-2/B, 11/A, 20/A wherein it was disclosed by Sanjay Chawla (PW-2) complainant/father of the deceased that he had received a call from his wife at about 2.45 pm stating that their son was kidnapped by 2-3 boys in a WagonR car no. DL-3378, after which he himself received a call from the mobile phone of his son and he was informed by the kidnappers that his son was in their custody and they demanded Rs.20 Lacs as ransom amount. FIR No. 217/2009 (Ex.PW-11/A) dated 28th July, 2009 was registered under Sections 364A/34 IPC at P.S. Vikaspuri. Eyewitness of the incident Shwetank (PW-3) narrated the entire incident to the IO Anand Lakra (PW-36) and then a team of police officials waited for a WagonR car with last digits `76' near Karnal by-pass but no such car was found and on the next morning at about 8-8.30 am, a call was received from PS Vasant Kunj that a dead body of a school boy was found near Mazar opposite Pocket C-8, DDA Flats, Vasant Kunj. The body of the deceased was taken to the AIIMS Mortuary, where the post mortem was conducted. The body was identified by father of the deceased (PW-2) and after the post mortem, was handed over to the father.

3. Post mortem was conducted by Dr. Sunay Mahesh (PW-24) on 29th July, 2009 at 1.30 pm. He tendered his report vide Ex.PW-24/A which noted:

i. Neck: On removing the ligature material from the neck, two ligature marks were visible. Ligature mark 1 was 6cm from chin and 14 cm from suprasternal notch of chest, 6 cm and 6.2 cm from right and left mastoid tips respectively. It was running backwards and upwards merging with posterior hair line. Ligature mark 2 wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top