SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SUDHIR KUMAR JAIN
Pankaj – Appellant
Versus
State – Respondent


Table of Content
1. bail application details and facts of the arrest (Para 1 , 2)
2. prior bail applications and judicial responses (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments regarding the nature and possession of the seized substance (Para 5 , 6)
4. provisions of ndps act regarding bail conditions (Para 7)
5. court's reasoning for denying bail (Para 8 , 9)

JUDGMENT

Sudhir Kumar Jain, J.

1. The petitioner filed present bail application under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as "the Code") for grant of regular bail in FIR bearing No. 899/2020 dated 04.11.2020 registered under sections 20 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (hereinafter referred to as "the NDPS Act").

2. The brief facts of the case are that on 04.11.2020 at around 2:00 PM in the afternoon, the petitioner along with co-accused Pankaj Giri was apprehended by the patrolling police on the Kanjhawala link road, Stone Market, Mangol Puri. The petitioner and co-accused were found to be carrying 22 kg and 81 kg of `ganja' respectively. The petitioner found to be carrying 22 kg of `ganja' on a TVS Scooty bearing no. DL11SW2226 and was pushing the rickshaw from behind with his

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top