Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Nishant Khatri – Appellant
Versus
Bar Council of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's concerns over non-conduct of aibe. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. supreme court directive on aibe conduct. (Para 5 , 6 , 8) |
| 3. understanding aibe requirements and situation. (Para 7 , 10 , 12) |
| 4. court's analysis of aibe rules. (Para 9 , 11) |
| 5. directions regarding aibe for advocates. (Para 13) |
| 6. next hearing scheduled. (Para 14) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The Petitioner - Nishat Khatri seeks directions against the Respondent No.1 - Bar Council of India (hereinafter, `BCI') in view of the non-conduct of the All India Bar Examination (`AIBE'). The Petitioner's concern is that he ought not to be debarred from practising as an advocate due to the non-conduct of the AIBE.
3. It is submitted by the Petitioner that in terms of Rules 9 and 10 of the All India Bar Examination Rules, 2010 (hereinafter, `AIBE Rules, 2010') the AIBE was introduced by the BCI on 5th June, 2010. The said exam is mandatory as per Rule 9 of the AIBE Rules, 2010, which provide that no advocate can practice under Chapter VI of the Advocates Act, 1961 without clearing the AIBE. Further, the AIBE is to be cleared by an advocate who is
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for advocates to clear the AIBE before being entitled to practice, and the need to balance the rights of advocates with the doctrin....
The main legal principle established is that LLB graduates in employment should be given the flexibility to appear in the All India Bar Examination and decide on employment after passing the exam, in....
(1) Bar Examination and pre-enrolment training – Bar Examination and pre-enrolment training – Quality of lawyers is an important aspect and part of administration of justice and access to justice – H....
Proof of residence for enrolment in Bar Council of Delhi is justified under the Advocates Act to maintain jurisdiction and order within the legal profession.
The court emphasized the need for transparency and convenience in the enrolment process, while upholding the requirement of proof of residence as necessary for maintaining discipline and regulatory c....
Enrolment as Advocate – Rule framed by BCI requiring a candidate for enrolment as an Advocate to have completed his law course from a college recognized/ approved by BCI cannot be said to be invalid.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
