Back
PRATHIBA M. SINGH
Sandeep – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed by the Petitioner - Mr. Sandeep, S/o Mr. Shishpal Singh, who is a LLB graduate from the batch of 2014- 2017, University of Delhi. The Petitioner has been working as a Senior Assistant with the Delhi Jal Board from 3rd October, 2016.
3. It is the case of the Petitioner that he wishes to appear in the All India Bar Examination (hereinafter, "AIBE-XVII"), which is scheduled to be held on 5th February, 2023. The last date of filing of the application form for AIBE-XVII is 16th January, 2023. The Petitioner is stated to have filed the application and provided all the required documents to the Respondent No.3 - Bar Council of Delhi (hereinafter, "BCD"). However, the provisional enrolment number has not yet been made available to the Petitioner, because of which he is unable to file the application for appearing in the AIBE-XVII. It is submitted that the following message was received from the office of the BCD on 14th December, 2022:
"Mr. Sandeep S/o Mr. Shishpal Singh
It has been informed that you had submitted your enrolment form on 12.10.2022 in Bar Council o
The main legal principle established is that LLB graduates in employment should be given the flexibility to appear in the All India Bar Examination and decide on employment after passing the exam, in....
The main legal point established in the judgment is the requirement for advocates to clear the AIBE before being entitled to practice, and the need to balance the rights of advocates with the doctrin....
(1) Bar Examination and pre-enrolment training – Bar Examination and pre-enrolment training – Quality of lawyers is an important aspect and part of administration of justice and access to justice – H....
The court emphasized the need for transparency and convenience in the enrolment process, while upholding the requirement of proof of residence as necessary for maintaining discipline and regulatory c....
The central legal point established in the judgment is the interpretation of the requirement of 'continuously practicing advocate for not less than 7 years' for selection to the Delhi Higher Judicial....
Point of Law : voluntarily suspended from legal practice then such a person cannot be said to have the legal right to practise as an Advocate.
Court directed BCI to extend enrolment time limit due to delay caused solely by State Bar Council post AIBE results.
The main legal point established in the judgment is that the number of opportunities for completing the LL.B. degree course cannot exceed the permissible opportunities as per the applicable rules and....
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
