SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
SATISH CHANDRA SHARMA, SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Pragati Engineers – Appellant
Versus
Government of NCT Delhi – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The instant writ petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, 1950, seeking quashing of communication dated 13.10.2022 issued by Government of NCT Delhi (GNCTD), i.e. Respondent No.1, whereby the bid of the Petitioner for Tender No. 18/SE/South Circle/PWD/2022-2023 for Supply, Installation, Testing and Commissioning (SITC) of Audio Video Conferencing System at VWDC, Saket Court Complex, New Delhi, was rejected.

2. The facts, in brief, leading to the instant petitions are as under:

a) It is stated that the tender in question was floated by Respondent No.1 on 20.09.2022 with the last date and time of submission of technical bid, original Earnest Deposit Money (EMD), copy of receipt for original EMD and other documents as specified in the Press Notice being 28.09.2022 upto 15:00 hrs. The eligibility criteria for a bidder to participate in a bid is as follows:

    "Eligibility criteria:

    Bidder satisfying following criteria shall be eligible for participating in the bid.

    (A) Manufacturer/OEM's and their authorized dealers of specified makes in NIT.

    (B) Registered contractors of CPWD-Registration in appropriate class in B & R Category and having ass

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top