SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
Arushi Setia @ Arushi Sethia – Appellant
Versus
State (GNCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. accident details and initial complaint (Para 1 , 2)
2. compensation received by complainant (Para 3)
3. settlement agreement and voluntary statement (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
4. quashing of fir due to settlement (Para 7)
5. conclusion and disposal of the petition (Para 8)

JUDGMENT

Dinesh Kumar Sharma, J. (Oral)--The present petition has been filed for quashing of FIR No. 156/2018 lodged PS Subhash Place under Section 279/338 of IPC.

2. The FIR was lodged on the statement of Mr. Ashok Kumar-Complainant wherein it was alleged that while he was going on Scooty along with his father, Wagon R Car driven by the petitioner in a rash and negligent manner hit against him. The complainant-Ashok Kumar had suffered injuries in the knees.

3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in claim petition bearing MACT/876/2019, the complainant-Ashok Kumar has already received a compensation of 7,50,000/- from the Insurance Company.

4. The parties have now reached on settlement at Delhi Mediation Centre, Rohini District Courts, Delhi dated 28th October, 2022. Settlement agreement dated 28th October, 2022 has been placed on record. In the terms of the settlement, the petitioner is req

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top