Mohit Tayal vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
JASMEET SINGH
Mohit Tayal – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

Table of Content
1. application for bail in a criminal case. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details of the alleged fraudulent property sale. (Para 3 , 4)
3. defendant's arguments regarding civil nature. (Para 5)
4. court's observations on misrepresentation. (Para 6 , 7)
5. legal definition and requirements of cheating. (Para 8)
6. court's refinement on the nature of inducement. (Para 9)
7. conclusion on bail application dismissal. (Para 10 , 11)

JUDGMENT

Jasmeet Singh, J. (Oral)--This is an application seeking bail in FIR No. 198/2022 dated 15.02.2022, registered at Police Station-Mayapuri, Delhi under section 420 IPC.

2. The applicant herein (Mohit Tayal) is the son of the directors Umesh Kumar and Sangeeta Tayal (applicant in 1543/2022 and BAIL APPLN. 1565/2022 respectively).

3. As per the FIR, it is stated that the complainant approached the parents and the applicant and showed his interest in purchasing the said property as it was adjacent to his already existing industrial unit (H-932). Pursuant to the negotiations, an Agreement to Sell dated 07.03.2019 was executed. The price of the property was fixed at Rs.81,50,000/- and the complainant over a period of time has admittedly paid Rs.33,50,000/-

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTJASMEET SINGHMohit Tayal – AppellantVersusState (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
JASMEET SINGH
Mohit Tayal – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent