SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Arun Kumar – Appellant
Versus
Deputy Conservator of Forest – Respondent


Table of Content
1. challenging the impugned order details. (Para 2)
2. allegations of not being heard. (Para 3 , 4)
3. rights to appeal under the act. (Para 5 , 6)
4. final decision on the petition. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)--This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner-Arun Kumar challenging the impugned order dated 11th November, 2022 passed by the Respondent-Deputy Conservator of Forest, Central Forest Division, GNCTD, who is the Tree Officer under Section 9, by which a sum of Rs.10,00,000/- had been directed to be deposited for felling of various trees. The operative portion of the said order reads as under:

    "Now, therefore, Sh. Harinder (Mali), of Dept. of Horticulture, PWD, Sh. Arui1 Kumar, Asst Director, Horticulture, PWD, Delhi DC Court, Nand Nagri, Delhi-93 are hereby directed to deposit Rs.10,60,000/- (Ten Lakhs and Sixty Thousand only) for felling of 13 full grown tree, heavily pruning 13 trees and 1 head back of 1 three, through demand draft in favour of DDO, Dy. Conservator of Forests (Central),.KNR, Delhi within 15 days of the receipt of this order."

3. Ld. Counsel for the Petit

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top