SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2026 Supreme(All) 386

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD
ATUL SREEDHARAN, SIDDHARTH NANDAN
Bihari Lal – Appellant
Versus
State Of U.P. – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
For the Petitioner: Amit Kumar Singh
For the Respondent: S.C.

JUDGMENT :

Siddharth Nandan, J.

1. Heard Sri Amit Kumar Singh, learned counsel for the petitioner and Ms. Kritika Singh, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. In pursuance of the order dated 23.02.2026, Sri Kasarla Raju, Divisional Director Social Forestry Division, Deoria is present.

2. Present petition has been filed seeking issuance of writ of certiorari, quashing the order dated 31.05.2025 passed by the respondent no.4, by way of which his online application seeking permission for felling of 10 teakwood trees, has been denied in spite of the recommendation by the Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Section Incharge Bankata, Range Bhatni.

3. The brief conspectus of facts giving rise to the present writ petition are that the property belongs to one Sharda Investment Company Ltd., Calcutta and the petitioner is the power of attorney holder of the company. He had moved an online application dated 13.02.2025 before the Sub Divisional Forest Officer, Section Incharge Bankata, Range Bhatni seeking permission to cut 10 teakwood trees and in pursuance whereof, a report dated 15.02.2025 was submitted, which has been annexed as annexure-4 to the affidavit filed along with the a

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top