SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATHIBA M.SINGH
Rohit Khurana – Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi – Respondent


Table of Content
1. refund of court fees and stamp duty. (Para 2 , 3)
2. court observations on refund application status. (Para 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments on legislative framework for refunds. (Para 9 , 10)
4. interpretation of refund provisions under unique circumstances. (Para 11)
5. order for refund before set date. (Para 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT

Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)

1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.

2. The present petition under Article 226 has been filed by the Petitioner- Mr. Rohit Khurana seeking refund of Rs.14,52,000/- purchased as a Non-Judicial E-Stamp for the purpose of filling a suit for specific performance.

3. The case of the Petitioner is that he had instituted CS (OS) 299/2017 titled Rohit Khurana v. Pradeeep Solanki & Ors. in which he had relied upon an agreement to sell and in order to exhibit his readiness and willingness had purchased the stamp paper in question for a sum of Rs.14,52,000/-. The said suit was withdrawn on 27th August, 2021 as the matter was settled. Thereafter, an application was filed by the Petitioner being I.A. 12354/2021 seeking return of stamp duty and refund of court fees paid in the said suit in which the following order wa

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top