SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(MP) 490

MANINDER S. BHATTI
Raj Bahore Mishra – Appellant
Versus
State of Madhya Pradesh – Respondent


Advocates Appeared:
Amit Khatri, Advocate, Sanjeev Kumar Singh, Advocate

JUDGMENT

1. This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed Signature Not Verified SAN assailing the order dtd. 22/9/2021 contained in Annexure-P/1. stamps amounting to Rs.50,190.00 on 20/11/2020 as the deed for which the same were purchased, could not be executed, therefore, the petitioner made an application seeking refund towards e-stamps through online mode on 1/4/2021. He further contends that said application through online mode was submitted on account of outbreak of Covid-19. Thereafter, upon relaxation from the lock-down, an application was physically submitted by the petitioner which is contained in Annexure-P/4 dtd. 30/6/2021. The application filed by the petitioner under Sec. 50(2) of the Indian Stamps Act, 1899 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Act, 1899') has been declined on the ground that the same has been submitted beyond the period of six months as provided under Sec. 50(2) of the Act, 1899. He further submits that an application for refund was moved online on 1/4/2021, which is contained in Annexure-P/3 and the respondents do not dispute that the petitioner herein applied online for refund of e-stamps on 1/4/2021. However, the responden

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top