SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
C.HARI SHANKAR
DFM Foods Ltd. – Appellant
Versus
Ishvi Food Private Limited – Respondent


Table of Content
1. settlement terms acknowledge trademark ownership and violations. (Para 1 , 1)
2. counsel agreed to abide by settlement terms. (Para 2)
3. no further adjudication necessary due to settlement. (Para 3)
4. suit decreed as per settlement terms. (Para 4 , 5 , 6)
5. plaintiff entitled to court fee refund if applicable. (Para 7)

JUDGMENT (Oral)

1. The dispute between the parties stands amicably resolved vide Settlement Agreement dated 28th September 2022, executed with the intervention of the Delhi High Court Mediation and Conciliation Centre. The Settlement Agreement has been placed on record. Learned Counsel for the parties are present. The terms of settlement, as per the Settlement Agreement, read thus:

    "i. The Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 acknowledge the Plaintiff to be the proprietor of the trademark "CURLS" as mentioned in paragraph 12 of the Plaint.

    ii. The Defendant Nos. 1 and 2 acknowledge that by stocking, offering for sale, selling or otherwise dealing in products bearing the "CURLS" trademarks of the Plaintiff, the Defendants have violated the trademark rights of the Plaintiff, as also passed off their products as those originating from the Plaintiff.

    iii. The Defend

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top