IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR
SAMEER JAIN, J.
Indian Mission of Medical Sciences Society – Petitioner
Versus
Union of India, through its Secretary, New Delhi – Respondent
S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 15646 of 2024
Decided On : 05-11-2024
(A) Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 - Section 10A - National Medical Commission Act, 2019 - Section 28(3) - Medical education - Petition for establishment of a Medical College with 150 seats denied due to deficiencies in faculty and infrastructure - The court upheld the decision of the National Medical Commission to allow only 100 seats based on inspection findings - The petitioner failed to meet the required standards for faculty and facilities as per statutory regulations. (Paras 27.1, 27.2, 27.3)
(B) Judicial Review - The court reiterated that it cannot interfere with expert assessments made by the National Medical Commission regarding medical education standards unless there is a clear violation of law or procedural irregularity. (Paras 28.1, 28.2)
JUDGMENT :
SAMEER JAIN, J.
“To study the phenomena of disease without books is to sail an uncharted sea, while to study books without patients is not to go to sea at all”
The famous saying elucidates the necessity of having not just a decent Medical College, but also the unspecified/specified requisites that actually makes an institution imparting medical education a noble institute and an ideal health care unit/hospital.
1. The instant petition is filed with the following prayers:
(I) To Quash and Set aside the order dated 04.07.2024, to the extent of reducing intake capacity from 150 to 100 seats of MBBS students.
(II) To Quash and Set aside the order dated 06.08.2024 dismissing the 1st appeal and the order dated 13.09.2024 dismissing the second appeal.
(III) To direct the respondents to allow the Petitioner to grant approval for Intake Capacity of 150 students for MBBS Course for the academic session 2024-25 onwards.
(IV) Any other writ or direction that the court deems fit, just and proper may kindly be issued in favour of the petitioner.
(V) Costs may kindly be also awarded in favor of the petitioner.”
2. The instant petition is filed under the provisions of Article 226 of the Constitution and primarily in the matter of Graduate Medical Education Regulations, 2023 and the guidelines for undergraduate courses under Establishment of New Medical Institutes, starting of New Medical Courses, increase of seats for existing courses and assessment and rating Regulations, 2023.
3. At the outset, learned counsel representing the petitioner-society had submitted that the petitioner is a society registered under the Societies Registration Act, 1958 with an object of promoting medical science and development of medical education and medical wellbeing of writ large. The said society was registered on 10.03.2010 (Annexure-1) and is working ever-since then. It was further contended that the field of medical education was regulated by the Indian Medical Council Act, 1956 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 1956) wherein, the council was developed for imparting education and maintaining standards of medical education within the country.
4. Considering the same and as per the provisions enumerated in Section 10A of the Act of 1956, the petitioner attained sanction from the Central Government. Further, it was contended that that as per the Act of 1956, Medical Council of India was established however, subsequently the Central Government diluted the Medical Council of India and the Act of 1956 was repealed and incorporated the National Medical Commission Act, 2019 (hereinafter referred to as Act of 2019). From that day forward the field of medical education is governed and regulated by the Act of 2019. Consecutively, the petitioner in order to establish a Medical College on the land belonging to it, applied before the Department of Medical Education for issuance of letter of permission (hereinafter referred to as LOP). The petitioner also appended the desired requirement for assessment and grant of LOP.
5. The Department of Medical Education after conducting preliminary verification issued permission vide letter dated 24.03.2023 (valid for a period of three academic years only) to the petitioner-society for establishing a Medical College with an intake capacity of 150 seats (Annexure-4). Resultantly, the petitioner after attaining requisite affiliation from the State authorities applied for affiliation and recognition from the Rajasthan University of Health Science (hereinafter referred to as RUHS). The said authority vide letter dated 09.04.2023 (Annexure-5) granted permission for establishment of a Medical College. Thereafter seeking requisite permissions (includin
Bharati Vidyapeeth vs. State of Maharashtra
Christian Medical College & Ors. vs. Medical Council of India
Dr. Preeti Srivastava and Anr. v. State of M.P. and Ors. (1999) 7 SCC 120
Faiza Choudhary vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir & Anr. (2012) 10 SCC 149
Fuljit Kaur vs. State of Punjab and Ors. (2010) 11 SCC 455
Harish Verma vs. Ajay Srivastava
Krishna Priya Ganguly & Ors. vs. University of Lucknow & Ors. (1984) 1 SCC 307
MCI vs. Rama Medical College Hospital and Research Centre
Medical Council of India vs. JSS Medical College & Anr. (2012) 5 SCC 628
Medical Council of India Vs. Kalinga Institute
Medical Council of India vs. Kalinga Institute of Medical Science (KIMS) & Ors. (2016) 11 SCC 530
State of M.P. vs. Gopal D. Tirthani
S. Krishna Sradha vs. State of Andhra Pradesh & Ors. (2020) 17 SCC 465
State of U.P. & Ors. vs. Sandeep Kumar Balmiki & Ors. (2009) 17 SCC 555
Veterinary Council of India vs. Indian Council for Agricultural Research
The court upheld the authority of the National Medical Commission to regulate medical education standards, emphasizing adherence to statutory requirements for college establishment.
The court held that expert regulatory bodies' assessments of medical institutions' deficiencies are not to be overridden by the judiciary unless significant jurisdictional errors are proven.
As per Clause 3 of the Scheme, which deals with qualifying criteria, the medical college/institution shall qualify to apply for increasing the number of admission in MBBS/PG Diploma/Degree/Higher Spe....
The court established that the National Medical Commission Act grants the MARB the authority to regulate medical education standards, including the power to reduce student intake based on inspection ....
Advocates appeared :For the Appellant : Siddharth Radhe Lal Gupta For the Respondent : J. K. Jain, Anoop Nair, Akshay Pawar
The Medical Assessment and Rating Board lacks jurisdiction to retrospectively cancel admissions, emphasizing the need for procedural fairness in educational regulation.
The central legal point established in the judgment is that the rejection of the petitioner's request for increasing the intake of students in the MBBS course was unjustified and unsustainable, as it....
The distinction between the establishment of new medical colleges and the enhancement of student intake in existing colleges is critical; prior judicial rulings must not impede justified applications....
Enhancement of medical college seats must be evaluated based on current infrastructure and faculty, not solely on past deficiencies or penalties.
When public interest is involved, facts emerging from subsequent events can be looked into to support an administrative order.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.