SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img



IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Jyoti Singh, J.
Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Appellant
Versus
P.K. Rathore (Dr.) - Respondent
W.P.(C) 9129 of 2022 & C.M. Appls. 27474 of 2022 and 30480 of 2022
Decided On : 16-12-2022




The National Commission for Scheduled Castes lacks jurisdiction to issue binding recommendations concerning service matters, as defined under Article 338 of the Constitution.

Headnote:(A) Constitution of India - Article 338 - Jurisdiction of National Commission for Scheduled Castes - Commission's recommendations regarding transfer and appointment are not binding and fall outside its jurisdiction - The orders issued by the Commission were quashed as they directed transfer which is a service matter and not within the Commission's purview. (Paras 9, 13, 17)

(B) Jurisdiction of Commission - Commission lacks authority to adjudicate service matters, as established in case law including All India Indian Overseas Bank SC & ST Employees' Welfare Association v. Union of India - Procedural powers of the commission for investigating complaints do not include powers of binding directions. (Paras 15, 16)

Facts of the case:
The Respondent, a member of Central Health Services, challenged his transfer order claiming it lacked authority and was motivated by malice. The Respondent later complained of discrimination based on caste grounds, prompting the Commission's interference, which led to ongoing legal proceedings in multiple forums.

Findings of Court:
The court found that the Commission acted beyond its jurisdiction in recommending transfer and appointments, leading to the quashing of its orders while allowing for the possibility of other legal remedies for the Respondent.

Issues: The main issues included the jurisdiction of the Commission to intervene in service-related matters and the validity of its recommendations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court held that the National Commission for Scheduled Castes cannot issue binding directions concerning service matters, reaffirming the legal principle that such matters are adjudicated in appropriate forums like the Central Administrative Tribunal.

Result: Writ petition allowed.

Table of Content
1. jurisdiction over transfer orders by the commission (Para 1 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. arguments concerning the jurisdiction of the commission and malice in transfer (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
3. court's interpretation of the commission's powers under article 338 (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
4. conclusion and orders regarding the impugned decisions (Para 18 , 19 , 20)

JUDGMENT

Jyoti Singh, J. (ORAL)

1. Present writ petition has been filed assailing the orders dated 23.10.2019, 27.05.2020 and 04.04.2022, passed by the National Commission for Scheduled Caste (hereinafter referred to as the `Commission') allegedly in contravention of Article 338 of the Constitution of India.

2. At the outset, Respondent No. 1, who appears in person, submits that he would be arguing the case himself and does not need assistance of a counsel.

3. Facts necessary and relevant for adjudication of the issue arising before this Court are that Respondent No. 1 (hereinafter referred to as the `Respondent') was transferred on 30.01.2019 as Head of the Department of ENT, MAMC to Guru Teg Bahadur Hospital. The order was challenged by the Respondent before the Central Administrative Tribunal in O.A. No. 436/2019, on the ground that Government of NCT of Delhi had no power to pass the transfer order. The Tribunal issued notice but no stay was granted. W.P.(C) 1934/2019 was filed by the Respondent, which was disposed of by this Court on 25.02.2019, granting interim stay. Finally, the O.A., was dismissed by the Tribunal and the review application was also rejected on 17.07.2019.

4. Writ petition being W.P.(C) 8981/2019 was filed by the Respondent assailing both the orders inter alia on the grounds that the transfer order was issued by GNCTD, which had no authority to issue the order, since the Respondent was a member of Central Health Services as also that the order was actuated by malice as Respondent had made complaints about financial irregularities at MAMC relating to certain purchases. The writ petition was dismissed by the Division Bench of this Court on 20.08.2019 and admittedly, the said order was not challenged by the Respondent.

5. After the dismissal of the writ petition, Respondent made a representation before Respondent No.2/Commission alleging discrimination and harassment on caste grounds. Summons dated 19.09.2019 were received from the Office of the Commission, directing the Principal Secretary to appear before the Commission on 09.10.2019, which was rescheduled to 22.10.2019. On 23.10.2019, an order was passed by the Commission observing that Respondent was facing harassment on account of frequent transfers and directing that he be placed in MAMC in six weeks. Vide letter dated 29.01.2020, the Commission was informed that Respondent had been transferred to GTBH due to administrative reasons and cannot be reverted.

6. Another notice dated 20.05.2020 was received from the Commission calling upon the officers of the Petitioners for hearing, along with relevant records on 26.05.2020. After the meeting, an order dated 27.05.2020 was forwarded to the Petitioners by the Commission recommending that Respondent be transferred to MAMC within 15 days maintaining his seniority and he should not be harassed on grounds of social origin. Action taken report was called for within three weeks.

7. On 04.07.2020, Petitioners passed an order transferring the Respondent to MAMC and he was also appointed as the Head of the Department of ENT. Yet another complaint was given by the Respondent on 25.08.2020 alleging supersession for the post of Medical Superintendent, Lok Nayak Hospital and a complaint was also filed before the Commission. Pursuant to the complaint, proceedings were held before the Commission and finally by order dated 04.04.2022, the Commission recommended that Respondent be considered for the post of Medical Director at Lok Nayak Hospital within two weeks and sought compliance within 21 days. Challenging the aforesaid orders, t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top