Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
Anil K.Narendran, Muralee Krishna S.
Vidya K.R. – Appellant
Versus
State Of Kerala, Represented By Its Principal Secretary To Government, Department Of Health And Family Welfare – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to transfer orders under supervisory jurisdiction (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments against transfer based on administrative necessities (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's authority in transfer matters and administrative discretion (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. judicial review constraints on transfer orders (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. dismissal of original petitions by the court (Para 16 , 22) |
JUDGMENT :
Muralee Krishna, J.
The applicant in O.A.(EKM)No.842 of 2025 on the file of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Additional Bench, Ernakulam (for short 'the Tribunal'), filed OP(KAT)No.384 of 2025 and the applicant in O.A.(EKM)No.849 of 2025 on the file of the very same Tribunal filed OP(KAT)No.385 of 2025, invoking the supervisory jurisdiction of this Court under Article 227 of the Constitution of India , challenging the impugned common order dated 15.09.2025 passed by the Tribunal in those original applications. For convenience, the parties and documents are referred in this judgment as they are referred in OP(KAT)No.384 of 2025, unless otherwise stated.
2. The petitioner in OP(KAT)No.384 of 2025 was transferred to Palakkad as District Medical Officer (Health), vide Annexure A1 order dat
Transfer of government employees is an administrative prerogative; courts will only intervene in cases of malafides or statutory violations.
Court affirmed that compassionate grounds can influence transfer decisions; the authority's discretion prevails unless there's a clear breach of rights or malafide actions.
The transfer of employees is considered an administrative matter subject to limited judicial review; only valid grounds, such as mala fides or violations of statutory provisions, warrant interference....
The High Court maintains limited supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, primarily to address grave derelictions from subordinate tribunals and not to substitute its own decisions on administrati....
The High Court affirmed its supervisory jurisdiction under Article 227, emphasizing the necessity of complying with judicial orders regarding employee postings to protect employment rights.
Court upheld that while transfers typically involve a three-year tenure, exceptions exist based on administrative necessity, emphasizing the requirement for such actions to serve public interest.
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
