IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, J.
St Martins Diocesan School - Appellant
Versus
Govt. of NCT of Delhi - Respondent
W.P.(C) 17273 of 2022
Decided On : 19-12-2022
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. qualifications for school managers prescribed. (Para 3) |
| 2. minority institutions exempt from management approval. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. constitution allows regulation of minority institutions. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. court's interim order on coercive actions. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 5. next steps and timeline for filing responses. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 54918/2022 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 17273/2022 & CM APPL. 54917/2022
3. The present petition has been preferred by St. Martin's Diocesan School/Petitioner No.1 and Somerville School/Petitioner No.3 (hereinafter collectively "Schools"), along with their respective Managers/Petitioner Nos. 2&4. Both these Schools are unaided minority institutions. They are aggrieved by the fact that the qualification for Managers of the schools is being prescribed in an indirect manner by the Directorate of Education, GNCTD (hereinafter "DOE") by applying Circular No.DDE/Act/15/2004/9012-9062 dated 24th November, 2004 issued by DOE, along with Order No.F.2(162)/Comp/DMC/2022/3580-3583 dated 12th October, 2022 issued by the Delhi Minorities Commission and Circular No.F.No.DE.15(882)/PSB/2022/9391-9396 dated 17th November, 2022, issued by the DOE. By these impugned orders/circulars, the qualification for the post of `Manager' of a school is being prescribed as under:
"A manager is required to have at least 10 years total experience in teaching and educational administration. Out of 10 years, at least 03 years shall be as in-charge of MCD/NDMC/Recognized/Middle/Sec/Sr.Sec.School. This certificate must be duly counter signed by EO/DEO of the concerned zone."
4. Mr. Chacko, ld. Counsel appearing for the Petitioners, relies upon the second Proviso to Section 5 of the Delhi School Education Act, 1973 (hereinafter "Act"), and Rule 59(3) of the Delhi School Education Rules, 1973 (hereinafter "Rules"), which according to him exempt minority institutions from obtaining approval for their scheme of management. The said provisions are set out below:
"Section 5. Scheme of management
(1) Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force or in any instrument having effect by virtue of any such law, the managing committee of every recognised school shall make, in accordance with the rules made under this Act and with the previous approval of the appropriate authority, a scheme of management for such school:
Provided that in the case of a recognised private school which does not receive any aid, the scheme of management shall apply with such variations and modifications as may be prescribed:
Provided further that so much of this sub-section as relates to the previous approval of the appropriate authority, shall not apply to a scheme of management for an unaided minority school.
(2) A scheme may be made, in like manner, to add, to vary or modify any scheme made under sub-section (1).
xxx xxx xxx
Rule 59.(3) The managing committee of an existing school shall make the draft of scheme of management after the commencement of these rules and shall, within 90 days from such commencement, submit such draft to the appropriate authority for its approval:
Provided that the appropriate authority may, after giving to the managing committee a reasonable opportunity of being head, make such alterations or modifications in the draft scheme of management as the circumstance of the case may require.
Provided further that the provisions of this sub-rule relating to the approval and alterations or modifications in the sphere of management by the appropriate authority shall not apply to a minority school in which case such approval and alterations or modifications shall be advisory and the draft scheme of management shall be valid."
5. It is submitted that contrary to the said provisions, a communication has been issued by the DOE on 8th
Unaided minority institutions are exempt from mandatory qualifications imposed by regulatory authorities as per Delhi School Education Act provisions, protecting their autonomy.
The Directorate of Education lacks authority to impose mandatory qualifications on Managers of private unaided schools, which may infringe their management autonomy, as affirmed by TMA Pai Foundation....
The eligibility criteria for appointment as an Officiating/Incharge Principal of an Intermediate College recognized and governed under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
The state has the authority to regulate the qualifications and service conditions of teachers in minority institutions to ensure educational standards, and the identification of surplus teachers is a....
The right of minority institutions to establish and administer educational institutions includes the right to appoint staff, which cannot be restricted by government regulations.
Regulation 101 of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 applies to minority institutions, mandating prior approval from the DIOS for non-teaching staff appointments to ensure compliance with stat....
The main legal principle established in the judgment is that the right of a religious minority to administer an educational institution of its choice, including the appointment of a Headmaster, is of....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.