IN THE HIGH COURT OF ALLAHABAD
Hon'ble Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, Hon'ble Anish Kumar Gupta, JJ.
State Of U P And Others – Appellant
Versus
Manoj Kumar Jain And Another – Respondents
Special Appeal No. - 537 of 2024
Decided On : 31-05-2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. disputed appointment circumstances. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 2. arguments regarding regulation 101 applicability. (Para 10 , 14 , 38 , 39) |
| 3. court observation on regulatory provisions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. analysis of the legal implications of regulation 101. (Para 15 , 16 , 18 , 20 , 21) |
| 5. court affirmations and legal interpretations regarding minority institution regulations are provided. (Para 30 , 46 , 50) |
| 6. conclusion on the applicability of regulation 101. (Para 42 , 43 , 53) |
| 7. conclusion drawn affirming the applicability of regulation and ruling in favor of the appellants. (Para 55) |
| 8. final order allowing the special appeal. (Para 56) |
JUDGMENT :
Hon. Mahesh Chandra Tripathi, J.
1. Heard Shri Fuzail Ahmad Ansari, learned Standing Counsel and Shri Ashish Mohan Srivastava, learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents-appellants and Shri Sankalp Narain, learned counsel for petitioner-respondent no.1.
2. This Court vide order dated 23.5.2024 has condoned the delay in filing the appeal and has directed to accord regular number to the appeal.
3. Present intra court appeal under Chapter VIII Rule 5 of the HIGH COURT RULES has been preferred assailing the validity of the judgment and order dated 9.5.2022 passed by learned Single Judge in Manoj Kumar Jain v. State of U.P. & Ors. Writ-A No.13182 of 2019, whereby the writ petition was allowed; orders dated 21.5.2019 and 9.7.2019 passed by District Inspector of Schools (DIOS), Aligarh have been quashed; the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Clerk in the institution has been upheld and the respondent no.3 was directed to grant financial sanction to the appointment of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Clerk and to make payment of arrears of salary w.e.f. 3.7.2018, the date of first disapproval of selection of the petitioner and to pay his month to month salary forthwith. For ready reference, the operative portion of the judgment and order dated 9.5.2022 is reproduced as under:-
The appointment of the petitioner on the post of Assistant Clerk in the institution is upheld and the respondent no.3 is directed by means of a positive mandamus as per the judgement of Apex Court in case of Comptroller And Auditor General of India & Another Vs. K.S. Jagannathan & Another, (1986) 2 SCC 676 to grant financial sanction to the appointment of the petitioner on the aforesaid post, within three months from today and make payment of arrears of his salary w.e.f., 3.7.2018, the date of first disapproval of selection of the petitioner, within same period and pay his month to month salary forthwith.
In case arrears of salary payable to the petitioner is not paid to him within the time provided by this Court, the petitioner would be entitled to get 12% interest on the arrears of the amount due.
The State Government shall be free to recover the amount of interest from the public servant/servants, who is/are found responsible for the delay.
The writ petition is allowed.
FACTS
4. Brief facts giving rise to the present appeal is that there is an educational institution known as ‘Shri Udai Singh Jain Kanya Inter College, Udai Singh Jain Road, Aligarh’,[ institution in question], which is a minority institution and is governed by the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 [Act, 1921] and the various Regulations framed thereunder from time to time. The institution also received grant-in-aid from the State Government and as such the Payment of Salary Act, 1971 is also applicable upon the institution. The clerical cadre of the institution comprises one post of Head Clerk and four posts of Asstt. Clerks. It is claimed that the sanctioned strength has already been determined in view of the Government Order dated 15.6.2012, which was issued in compliance of the direction dated 22.5.2012 passed by this Court in the case of Dhruv Narain Singh v. State of U.P. & Ors., Writ Petition No.263
Abhishek Tripathi v.s State of U.P. and others
Committee of Management, Swami Lila Shah Adarsh Sindhi Inter College & Anr v. State of U.P. & Ors
Deeepak Agarwal and Anr. v. State of U.P. and Ors. (2011) 6 SCC 725
Harpal Singh Vs. State of U.P.
Krishna Kant v. State of U.P. & Ors. 2018 (11) ADJ 419
Matankara Syrian Catholic College vs. T. Jose
Mohanlal Goenka v. Benoy Krishna Mukherjee AIR 1953 SC 65 (SC)
Rajasthan State Sports Council and Anr. v. Uma Dadhich and Anr. (2019) 4 SCC 316
Sindhi Education Society & Anr v. Chief Secretary, Government of NCT of Delhi & Ors
Sister Meera v. State of U.P. 2013 (10) ADJ 310
State of U.P. v. Manager, Committee of Management, Islamia Inter College & Ors.
State of West Bengal v. Hemant Kumar Bhattacharjee AIR 1966 SC 1061
Regulation 101 of the U.P. Intermediate Education Act, 1921 applies to minority institutions, mandating prior approval from the DIOS for non-teaching staff appointments to ensure compliance with stat....
A candidate has a right to be considered in light of existing Rules which implies Rules in force as on date of consideration.
An appointment without prior approval under Section 101 of the Regulation would be a nullity in so far as it purports to bind the State Government to grant aid to the institution concerned for paymen....
The eligibility criteria for appointment as an Officiating/Incharge Principal of an Intermediate College recognized and governed under the Intermediate Education Act, 1921.
The court upheld that the appointments made before changes in recruitment policy must be considered valid under the laws in effect at that time, emphasizing the integrity of the selection process.
The central legal point established in the judgment is the need for compliance with the MEPS Act, 1981, in the context of minority institutions and the interpretation of the act in relation to staffi....
The rights of minorities to establish and administer educational institutions of their choice under Article 30 of the Constitution of India are subject to reasonable regulations that are necessary to....
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.