SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
YOGESH KHANNA
Tejinder Bishnoi – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Chandigarh (State) – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Yogesh Khanna, J. This petition is filed with the following prayers;

    "A. Call for records and quash and set-aside impugned orders dated 29.10.2021 passed by the court of Principal District and Session Judge (PC Act) (CBI), Rouse Avenue Court, New Delhi, order dated 28.01.2020 passed by the court of Addl. Session Judge, Chandigarh and order framing charges dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Addl. Session Judge, Chandigarh and consequent framing of formal charges dated 31.01.2020 in case FIR no. 194/2017 dated 19.09.2017 u/s 409/420/120B/201 IPC & Section 8/9/13(1) (d) r/w 13 (2) PC Act, PS. 03 (SIT), District Chandigarh."

2. The brief facts are: a final report was presented under Sections 8/9/13(1)(d) read with Section 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act and under Sections 409/420/120B/201 IPC against nine accused person, including the present petitioner. The allegations are the exam of HCS (Judiciary) (Preliminary)-2017 was fixed on 16.07.2017. Balwinder Kumar Sharma was the custodian of paper being Registrar (Recruitment), High Court of Punjab and Haryana, Chandigarh. He handed over the question paper to one Sunita, a candidate for said exam. Accused Balwinder Kumar Sharm

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top