SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
YOGESH KHANNA
Tejinder Bishnoi – Appellant
Versus
Union Territory Chandigarh (State) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. allegations of exam paper leakage. (Para 2)
2. discovery of leaked exam paper leads to petition. (Para 3)
3. court's opinion on sufficiency of evidence. (Para 4)
4. arguments regarding evidence against the petitioner. (Para 5)
5. legal standards for framing charges discussed. (Para 6)
6. evaluating evidence for prima facie case. (Para 10)
7. court finds sufficient evidence for charges. (Para 14)
8. petition dismissed due to inaction and delay. (Para 15 , 16)

JUDGMENT

Yogesh Khanna, J. This petition is filed with the following prayers;

    "A. Call for records and quash and set-aside impugned orders dated 29.10.2021 passed by the court of Principal District and Session Judge (PC Act) (CBI), Rouse Avenue Court, New Delhi, order dated 28.01.2020 passed by the court of Addl. Session Judge, Chandigarh and order framing charges dated 31.01.2020 passed by the Addl. Session Judge, Chandigarh and consequent framing of formal charges dated 31.01.2020 in case FIR no. 194/2017 dated 19.09.2017 u/s 409/420/120B/201 IPC & Section 8/9/13(1) (d) r/w 13 (2) PC Act, PS. 03 (SIT), District Chandigarh."

2. The brief facts are: a final report was presented under Sections 8/9/13(1)(d) read with

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top