SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J.

1. The present appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, "the Act"] is directed against an order dated 23.10.2022 by which a three-member Arbitral Tribunal [hereinafter, "the Tribunal"] has rejected an application of the appellant for interim measures under Section 17 of the Act.

I. Factual Background:

2. The Tribunal is in seisin of disputes between the parties under a Concession Agreement dated 21.01.2011 [hereinafter, "CA"] with regard to "Four Laning of Panvel-Indapur Section of NH-17 from KM 0.000 to KM 84.000 in the State of Maharashtra", on Build Operate Transfer [hereinafter, "BOT"] basis.1 The original period for completion of the work was 910 days, the scheduled date of completion being 16.06.2014. The CA envisaged a concession period of 21 years from 19.12.2011 and payment of an additional concession fee by the appellant. The relevant clauses of the CA, cited in the course of arguments, are set out later in this judgment.

3. The project has admittedly not achieved completion within the time originally stipulated. The substantive dispute between the parties relates to the responsibility for

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top