SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
PRATEEK JALAN
Supreme Panvel Indapur Tollways Private Limited – Appellant
Versus
National Highways Authority of India – Respondent


Table of Content
1. disputes over contract completion (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7)
2. tribunal's prima facie findings (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14)
3. arguments on entitlement to relief (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
4. determinability and implications (Para 39 , 40 , 41)
5. conclusion of the appeal (Para 45 , 46)

JUDGMENT

Prateek Jalan, J.

1. The present appeal under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 [hereinafter, "the Act"] is directed against an order dated 23.10.2022 by which a three-member Arbitral Tribunal [hereinafter, "the Tribunal"] has rejected an application of the appellant for interim measures under Section 17 of the Act.

I. Factual Background:

2. The Tribunal is in seisin of disputes between the parties under a Concession Agreement dated 21.01.2011 [hereinafter, "CA"] with regard to "Four Laning of Panvel-Indapur Section of NH-17 from KM 0.000 to KM 84.000 in the State of Maharashtra", on Build Operate Transfer [hereinafter, "BOT"] basis.1 The original period for completion of the work was 910 days, the scheduled date of completion being 16.06.2014. The CA envisaged a concession period of 21 years from 19.12.2011 and payment of an addi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top