SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
Komal Chadha – Appellant
Versus
Serious Fraud Investigation Office – Respondent


JUDGMENT

Anup Jairam Bhambhani J.

By way of the present petition under section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ('Cr.P.C.' for short) the petitioner, who is accused in CC No.245/2021 titled SFIO vs. Parul Polymers Pvt. Ltd & Ors. pending before the learned Special Judge (Companies Act), Dwarka Courts, New Delhi), seeks regular bail.

2. The petitioner is arraigned as accused No. 3 in the trial court proceedings, among 12 other accused.

3. Notice on this petition was issued on 02.06.2022; consequent whereupon the respondent/Serious Fraud Investigation Office ('SFIO' for short) has filed reply/counter-affidavit dated 10.08.2022 opposing grant of bail.

4. Briefly, the petitioner was summonsed in the matter vide summoning order dated 07.03.2022 made by the learned Special Judge (Companies Act), Dwarka Courts (SW), the essential imputation against the petitioner being that she was director of M/s Parul Polymers Pvt Ltd. (accused No. 1), being the wife of Suman Chadha, who was the other director of the company; and taking cognisance of offences inter-alia under section 447 of the Companies Act, 2013 ('Companies Act' for short).

5. The gravamen of the offences alleged in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top