Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
National Book Trust of India – Appellant
Versus
Daya Chand – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background of employment dispute (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. procedural history of judicial references (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 3. presentation of evidence (Para 10 , 11) |
| 4. challenge to labour court findings (Para 12 , 13) |
| 5. petitioner's arguments against 'industry' classification (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. petitioner's evidence supporting daily wage claim (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 7. respondent's rebuttal and evidence (Para 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 8. legal interpretation of workman status and industry definition (Para 34 , 35 , 36) |
| 9. court's detailed reasoning on employment definitions (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 10. evaluating the claim for continuous service (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 11. affirmation of continuous service for claim validity (Para 49 , 50) |
| 12. determination of relief and compensation (Para 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 13. final order and payment instructions (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57) |
JUDGMENT
Gaurang Kanth, J. The present Writ Petition emanates from the Award dated 05.05.2010 ("Impugned Award") passed by the Court of Sh. T.S Kashyap, Presiding Officer, Labor Court-XIX, Karkardooma Courts: Delhi in LIR No. 472/08 (Old No. ID-150/03) ti
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
