Back
DELHI HIGH COURT
GAURANG KANTH
Kale Ram – Appellant
Versus
Ajay – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the accident and compensation awarded (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments for enhancement of compensation by the appellant (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. response from the respondent's side about the compensation awarded (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. court's analysis of claims and established legal principles (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. assessment of compensation due to permanent disability (Para 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 6. calculation of loss of earnings and impact of leave (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 30) |
| 7. court's decision on compensation for future loss of income (Para 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 8. (Para 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
JUDGMENT
Gaurang Kanth, J. The present appeal has been preferred by the appellant under Section 173 of the Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 against the award dated 31.01.2013 ("impugned award") passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Patiala House Court, New Delhi.
2. By way of the impugned award, the learned Claims Tribunal awarded a compensation of Rs.Rs.2,66,128/- (Two lakhs Sixty Six Thousand One Hundred and Twenty Eight Rupees) with interest @ 9% per annum from the date of filing of petition till the date of realisation. All the respo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
