Mumtaz vs State (NCT of Delhi)

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT MAHAJAN
Mumtaz – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

Table of Content
1. filing of bail application and initial facts (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4)
2. arguments regarding the applicant's bail status (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 9 , 10)
3. court's analysis of bail criteria and applicant's situation (Para 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
4. conditions for bail release (Para 19 , 20)
5. conclusion and final decision on bail application (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

1. The present application is filed under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C."), seeking regular bail in FIR No. 471/2022, filed under Section 25 of the Arms Act, 1959, registered at Police Station Sabzi Mandi.

2. It is alleged that on a specific input that the accused persons call people from all over Delhi and other States for the purpose of gambling, on 28.08.2022, a raid was conducted on the ground floor of House No. 32/6, Ground Floor, Sita Saran Colony, Sabzi Mandi in which 48 persons were apprehended and the FIR under Sections 3/4/5/9/55 of the Delhi Public Gambling Act, 1955, was registered at PS Sabzi Mandi.

3. It is claimed that during the search, various weapons were recovered.

4. One semi-automatic pistol along with five cartridges were recovered from the appli

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

DELHI HIGH COURTAMIT MAHAJANMumtaz – AppellantVersusState (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT MAHAJAN
Mumtaz – Appellant
Versus
State (NCT of Delhi) – Respondent