SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

DELHI HIGH COURT
AMIT MAHAJAN
Akshay Dhingra – Appellant
Versus
State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi) – Respondent


Table of Content
1. application for pre-arrest bail in a theft case (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments regarding matrimonial discord and property ownership (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10)
3. assessment of evidence and implications of husband’s actions (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16)
4. denial of pre-arrest bail application (Para 17)
5. clarification on observations made in the order (Para 18)

JUDGMENT

1. The present application under Section 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 is filed by the applicant seeking pre-arrest bail in FIR No. 826/2022 dated 24.09.2022 under Section 380 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 registered at police station K.N. Katju Marg, Rohini.

2. The FIR was registered on a complaint made by Mrs. Ashka Kholi alleging that the household articles have been stolen while she was away from her house.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is married to the complainant and the FIR was registered due to matrimonial discord.

4. He submits that the parties are litigating and the house from where the articles are alleged to be stolen was taken on rent by the applicant.

5. He submits that the complainant, on her own, had left that house

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top