State vs Mohd. Naved @ Pilla

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
State – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Naved @ Pilla – Respondent

Table of Content
1. cancellation of bail application context (Para 1 , 2)
2. arguments against and in favor of bail cancellation (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. legal standards for canceling bail (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13)
4. court's review and analysis of bail conditions (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17)
5. court's findings on bail orders and implications (Para 18 , 19 , 20)
6. final ruling and dismissal of bail cancellation (Para 21 , 22)

JUDGMENT

Swarana Kanta Sharma, J.

1. The applicant/State has preferred the present application under Sections 439(2) read with 482 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ("Cr.P.C.") seeking cancellation of bail granted to accused/respondent Mohd. Naved@Pilla in case FIR No. 964/2015, registered at Police Station Sarai Rohilla, under Sections 302/34 of Indian Penal Code, 1860 ("IPC").

2. The respondent was granted regular bail in the aforesaid case vide order dated 10.10.2018 by learned Additional Sessions Judge, Tis Hazari Courts, New Delhi in SC No.28312/2016 titled as "State vs. Mohd. Naved @ Peela".

3. The case of applicant is that the respondent Mohd. Naved @ Pilla misused the liberty granted by the Court and started getting involved in serious crimina

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

SWARANA KANTA SHARMAState – AppellantVersusMohd. Naved @ Pilla – Respondent

SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
State – Appellant
Versus
Mohd. Naved @ Pilla – Respondent